Page 44 - It Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Leads take them, determining whether the leads relayed to the suspect in it case, faisal shahzad. the f.b.i. has gone to pakistan to see who he was in contact with and talked to possible witnesses. pakistani authorities are helping in that angle. today we have arrests relate today who may have financed the operation. these people may be unwitting assistants and may not have known they were -- that their assistance was going to shahzad's plat but feds say armed with information from shahzad, the arrests were the next step in the investigation. >> shepard: how much bigger do we think this will g...

Jon: i'm jon scott, along with jane skinner "happening now", new details on the investigation involving the times square bombing, general petraeus, head of central command says he believes the suspect, faisal shahzhad, acted as a lone wolf, yet there are many questions to answer in it case. o in this case, federal law enforcement saying they are looking for some kind of a money man who helped bankroll the pakistan-born u.s. citizen. he is seen here on surveillance video, purchasing the same kind of fire works found attached to a crude bomb in his nissan pathfinder. one official telling the ass...

This and it shows the congressman's reaction. does it put an end'question on whether congressman cleaver was spat upon? >> it doesn't. it doesn't make it case that spit versus whether he was a voice yerl. i can't believe this is the issue we are discussion on "kelly's court." but it does show a couple of things -- you a assuming your going to be proving this guy is guilty. spit did lodge from his mouth to the head of the congressman. secondly we know he had a motive. he obviously was not pleased with him or anybody who walked by. there is no mistake of identity it's clearly him from the the sp...

Such an important case. this is by far the most important supreme court case that he was involved in. martha: this was a friend of the court, ef not directly involved in the case. he was a friend of the court briefing, correct? >> absolutely. it was a friend of the court brief, but in fact, he was actually a client in this case. he wasn't a lawyer on the brief. he was actually representing his own views. there was a -- there were lawyers who were hired pro bono who represented him so in it case, you can usually say lawyers who write briefs, they may not believe the briefs that were written but...

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.