Stay updated with breaking news from It doesnt go on. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Research of any consequence was presented. so it looked to be if you are going to use the bank robbery analogy, you didn t end up with a plan and don t up doing anything. one of the president s lawyers did the full ginsburg today. let s look at some excerpt of those appearances. you know that goes on in campaigns all the time. opposition research goes on all the the time. chris: it doesn t go on with the russians all the time. isn t it important whether or not it s legal, whether or not it s wrong, whether or now it s ethical? what took place legal or not. almost every legal expert says it s not illegal. how report emphasis on it s not illegal, does that help the ....
Donald trump jr.? no, i don t represent donald trump jr. and i do not know everyone for sure that was at that meeting and the president was not there. the president wasn t aware of the meeting and did not attend it. doesn t it show intent and willingness on the part of don jr. and jared and paul manafort to collude with the russians and veselnitskaya was not just some russian off the street. she had close ties to people in the kremlin. number one, if there was, the discussion was going to be about, if it was going to be about russian opposition research that a russian lawyer had, the fact is, those go on, you know that goes on in campaigns all the time. opposition research is a big part of campaigning. it doesn t go on with the russians all the time, jay. but look, here s what happened. first of all nothing happened. isn t it also important whether or not it s legal, whether or not it s wrong, whether or not it s ethical? you re conflating, jake, three perspectives here. ....
Opposition research is a big part of the campaign. it doesn t go on with russians all the time, gentleman i. look, this was here s what happened. first of all, nothing happened. isn t it also important whether or not it s legal, whether or not it s wrong, whether or not it s ethical? you can conflating, jake, three perspectives here. the legality, was the meeting and what took place legal or not? as almost every legal expert says, it s not illegal. then you are trying to put a moral ethical aspect to it. it s easy to do that in 20/20 hindsight, but not in the middle of a campaign. a news poll shows doubt to the extent that russia played a role in the 2016 presidential election. 40% of americans are either unsure or don t think it happened. since april, the number of republicans and conservative independents that believe russia played a role and the trump team sought to benefit from it has been cut in half. ....
Most lawyers, the vast majority issue of you and others have those proposed discussions would not have been a violation of the law. the point if it does show willingness, perhaps not collusion because apparently none of us know what really went on during the meeting. assuming at least i m not point everyone is telling the truth. doesn t it show intent and willingness on the part of don junior and garrett and paul manafort to collude with the russians? when they play now, it was not just some russia not the street. she had close ties to the people in the kremlin. number one, the discussion if it was going to be about russian opposition research that the lawyer had, the fact is, you know that goes on in campaigns all the time. it doesn t go on with russians all the time, jay. ....
Research of any consequence was presented. so it looked to be if you are going to use the bank robbery analogy, you didn t end up with a plan and don t up doing anything. one of the president s lawyers did the full ginsburg today. let s look at some excerpt of those appearances. you know that goes on in campaigns all the time. opposition research goes on all the the time. chris: it doesn t go on with the russians all the time. isn t it important whether or not it s legal, whether or not it s wrong, whether or now it s ethical? what took place legal or not. almost every legal expert says it s not illegal. how report emphasis on it s not illegal, does that help the president s case? ....