Stay updated with breaking news from It truth. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
conviction later. it goes to show, i think. _ conviction later. it goes to show, i think. the — conviction later. it goes to show, i think, the most frustrating thing on behalf— think, the most frustrating thing on behalf of— think, the most frustrating thing on behalf of the family is that he is still not — behalf of the family is that he is still not telling the truth. he still not telling the truth. he still intending this fiction that somehow it was an accident. when it is obvious— somehow it was an accident. when it is obvious that he shot his girlfriend deliberately. he claims that religious man, if you generally was a _ that religious man, if you generally was a ridges —— religious man, he would _ was a ridges —— religious man, he would tell— was a ridges —— religious man, he would tell it — was a ridges —— religious man, he would tell it truth and get some followers to her family.- would tell it truth and get some followers to her family. what we don't know. _ followers to her family. what we don't know, is _ followers to her family. what we don't know, is a _ followers to her family. what we don't know, is a condition - followers to her family. what we don't know, is a condition he's i don't know, is a condition he's living in now, living with, we understand, and uncle, but we don't know more than that and there are concerns of what training and treatments he has had while he has been imprisoned.— treatments he has had while he has been imprisoned. yes, south african -risons been imprisoned. yes, south african prisons aren't _ been imprisoned. yes, south african prisons aren't very _ been imprisoned. yes, south african prisons aren't very well _ been imprisoned. yes, south african prisons aren't very well known - been imprisoned. yes, south african prisons aren't very well known to - been imprisoned. yes, south africanj prisons aren't very well known to me to be honest but i do not setup guys facing at issue of the messick abuse what they have the highest rates of homicide in the world.— homicide in the world. sorry, we have to interrupt, _ homicide in the world. sorry, we have to interrupt, we _ homicide in the world. sorry, we have to interrupt, we will - homicide in the world. sorry, we have to interrupt, we will be - homicide in the world. sorry, we| have to interrupt, we will be back with you shortly. good evening.
noticeably absent, edward, frontrunner donald trump who posted this video you're sheing here. his fourth of july video. he posted to it truth social showing his massive rally saturday. trump has a commanding lead in the polling among gop primary voters with 56% closest to is him is desantis. finally, edward, despite calls on social media for joey chest nut who just won his 16th mustard belt, calls to run for president. no indication he will be entering politics any time soon. >> on the run for major suarez, maybe we should see the other candidates run for the white house. >> i say let's do it. a 5-k race for the white house. >> edward: thanks, griff. political magazine urning more
what was the cause for the delay. just while we _ what was the cause for the delay. just while we are _ what was the cause for the delay. just while we are waiting, - what was the cause for the delay. just while we are waiting, we're l just while we are waiting, we're just seeing from outside the court. looks like they are setting up microphones for somebody to come out and make a statement, so we will keep a watch what we are talking to you, but really to go back to the case itself, there was a lot at stake, wasn't there, for the reputation of fox news but also this idea of libel laws versus the right to free speech, so if you could just take us through your sort of thoughts about the case in general? absolutely. i mentioned earlier the really— absolutely. i mentioned earlier the really powerful _ absolutely. i mentioned earlier the really powerful defence _ absolutely. i mentioned earlier the really powerful defence at - absolutely. i mentioned earlier the really powerful defence at fox's - really powerful defence at fox's side was — really powerful defence at fox's side was actual— really powerful defence at fox's side was actual malice, - really powerful defence at fox's side was actual malice, and - really powerful defence at fox's| side was actual malice, and that really powerful defence at fox's i side was actual malice, and that is a standard — side was actual malice, and that is a standard that _ side was actual malice, and that is a standard that has— side was actual malice, and that is a standard that has existed - side was actual malice, and that is a standard that has existed ever. a standard that has existed ever since _ a standard that has existed ever since new— a standard that has existed ever since new york _ a standard that has existed ever since new york times _ a standard that has existed ever since new york times versus i a standard that has existed ever- since new york times versus sullivan nrore _ since new york times versus sullivan more than _ since new york times versus sullivan more than a — since new york times versus sullivan more than a half—century— since new york times versus sullivan more than a half—century ago. - since new york times versus sullivan more than a half—century ago. that . more than a half—century ago. that basically— more than a half—century ago. that basically forces _ more than a half—century ago. that basically forces someone _ more than a half—century ago. that basically forces someone to - more than a half—century ago. that basically forces someone to prove. basically forces someone to prove that a _ basically forces someone to prove that a news— basically forces someone to prove that a news organisation - basically forces someone to prove. that a news organisation knowingly published — that a news organisation knowingly published false _ that a news organisation knowingly published false information - that a news organisation knowingly published false information or- that a news organisation knowingly published false information or did. published false information or did so with— published false information or did so with reckless _ published false information or did so with reckless disregard - published false information or did so with reckless disregard for- published false information or did so with reckless disregard for the| so with reckless disregard for the truth _ so with reckless disregard for the truth that — so with reckless disregard for the truth. that standard _ so with reckless disregard for the truth. that standard has - so with reckless disregard for the truth. that standard has enduredj so with reckless disregard for the i truth. that standard has endured for more _ truth. that standard has endured for more than _ truth. that standard has endured for more than half— truth. that standard has endured for more than half a _ truth. that standard has endured for more than half a century— truth. that standard has endured for more than half a century and - truth. that standard has endured for more than half a century and it- truth. that standard has endured for more than half a century and it is. more than half a century and it is coming under— more than half a century and it is
over the objective truth to ai because they are the only ones that don't have partisanship in their truth, in their objectivity, and the moment that happens it because becomes weaponize. call me a skeptic but i don't know how i feel about a man saying this stuff is dangerous and going to kill all of us i'm going to make my own. you know, there is a little bit going on there that i'm like, i don't know if yours is going to be any better just because you called it truth in the name. that is not to beat up on elon musk but just to say, this is a tool that can be weaponized against us, and like greg is saying, it is also allowing it into our lives that is going to allow that to happen. right now, people don't understand this, that the overarching blanket we call ai, it is not the matrix or terminator, it is algorithms, it is how it trains us, and that is what we are worried about. >> jeanine: and dana come in the end, we can get a hold of this now, we can't stop it, it is already on the way to wherever it is going. >> dana: i think this conversation is super valuable that we are having here and the one that elon musk and tucker had last night, i do worry these
saying basically it's a racist trope but everyone hears the dog whistle and no one likes that less than latinos in arizona who happen to be eligible to vote because they are american first. >> everyone does hear the dog whistle, and i think we often make the mistake of talking about disinformation and attacks on our democracy as though they exist separately from racism racism. >> absolutely. we need to tell it truth. there's a piece in the atlantic talking about fear, hatred motivating. the demographic shifts represent an existential threat. and so part of the work we have to do is tell the truth about what's motivating these and understand that history -- our history suggests we standby silently and we descend into indark ages. we've done it before. 53,000 black folks just from my
>> well, he works for a network -- >> okay. >> that provides people with questions that nothing personal to any individual, including peter doocy, but might make anyone sound like a stupid son of a [ bleep ]. >> let's bring in cnn's brian stelter. obviously he has at times been a thorn in the side of jen. doesn't that come with the territory? >> it does come with the territory. i think the point she's trying to say there is that fox pushes story lines that are sometimes nonsense. doocy does that in the briefing room. still, she did it in a way playing to a liberal audience that will certainly cause a lot of outrage from fox probably the next few days, right? here's what the network says in a statement. fox telling me, peter doocy's job is to eloose it truth from power for the american public.
day. january 6th was the protest. that is delusional, of course. but trump says he's launching a new platform to amplify these lies. he's starting his own social media brand. he's going to call it truth social. now there are rules on truth. for example, apparently, you can't say anything bad about trump. and when trump and other users post their messages, they're going to be called truths. hundred bucks says trump's first truth on truth will be a lie because he's a liar. the other loathsome thing he did this week is when he attacked the late colin powell. he was a classic rhino, if even that. always being the first to attack other republicans. he made plenty of mistakes, but anyway, may he rest in peace. for years, powell tried to warn republicans about the direction of the republican party. back in 2008, powell called out republicans who were falsely
city that served as the capital of the proslavery south. finally, however, the statue of civil war general robert e lee was coming down, to the delight of hundreds that had gathered to witness the historic event. it's a beautiful moment in this country, this isn't the end but this signifies that we are accepting the past for what it really is. we can't hold the confederacy and people like robert e lee on statues anymore. we've got to hold the truth on a statue. for anymore. we've got to hold the truth on a statue.— truth on a statue. for it to finally come _ truth on a statue. for it to finally come down, - truth on a statue. for it to finally come down, it - truth on a statue. for it to finally come down, it is i truth on a statue. for it to finally come down, it is al finally come down, it is a moment_ finally come down, it is a moment ofjoy for me because it represents— moment ofjoy for me because it represents so much oppression, because — represents so much oppression, because who robert e lee represents.— because who robert e lee represents. i'm white, you know, represents. i'm white, you know. i'm _ represents. i'm white, you know, i'm not _ represents. i'm white, you know, i'm not directly - represents. i'm white, you - know, i'm not directly offended by it_ know, i'm not directly offended by it but — know, i'm not directly offended by it but they _ know, i'm not directly offended by it but they imagine - know, i'm not directly offended by it but they imagine it's - know, i'm not directly offended by it but they imagine it's got l by it but they imagine it's got to be — by it but they imagine it's got to be hard _ by it but they imagine it's got to be hard for— by it but they imagine it's got to be hard for black - by it but they imagine it's got to be hard for black people i by it but they imagine it's got| to be hard for black people to have — to be hard for black people to have to — to be hard for black people to have to go _ to be hard for black people to have to go by _ to be hard for black people to have to go by those _ to be hard for black people to have to go by those statues . to be hard for black people to| have to go by those statues in a public— have to go by those statues in a public space, _ have to go by those statues in a public space, on— have to go by those statues in
happen? that work has been going on. there have been _ happen? that work has been going on. there have been investigations - there have been investigations sometimes, sometimes multiple times into incidents. there has been evidence — into incidents. there has been evidence gathered but we have seen problems— evidence gathered but we have seen problems where some of that evidence has come _ problems where some of that evidence has come to— problems where some of that evidence has come to court. that happened very recently where court cases against — very recently where court cases against british army veterans has collapsed — against british army veterans has collapsed because of the way evidence has been gathered and presented. other cases have been withdrawn. so there have been numerous _ withdrawn. so there have been numerous attempts to investigate some _ numerous attempts to investigate some of— numerous attempts to investigate some of these incidents but it has not always— some of these incidents but it has not always lead to the conclusion is that particularly victims' families would _ that particularly victims' families would have wanted. many families are still left _ would have wanted. many families are still left disappointed, left with unanswered questions. if there is going _ unanswered questions. if there is going to — unanswered questions. if there is going to be a statute of limitation that in— going to be a statute of limitation that in effect cuts off the possibility of any further criminal investigation but that won't go down very well— investigation but that won't go down very well with them, but will there be a possibility of some sort of truth _ be a possibility of some sort of truth and — be a possibility of some sort of truth and reconciliation commission, perhaps. _ truth and reconciliation commission, perhaps, that would provide the truth, _ perhaps, that would provide the truth, some facts, some answers, even _ truth, some facts, some answers, even if— truth, some facts, some answers, even if it— truth, some facts, some answers, even if it were not to lead to a criminal— even if it were not to lead to a criminal prosecution? that is something we will wait for in the detail— something we will wait for in the detail of— something we will wait for in the
truthful in that clip, corrected? >> my interview with him could be interpreted any way you like. >> cnn political commentator joe lockhart is with us, former press secretary of course for president clinton. lying never a good look. that said, the american people sadly expected in many ways a certain, it of politicians. feels a little different obviously your former boss accused of lying. look at corey lewandowski essentially saying i only have to tell it truth when under oath. a man considering a run for senate. where are we now? >> i think it reflects his boss. you know? we have 12,000 and still running mistruths, untruths, distortions coming from donald trump and i think he was there to please his boss. because his future political aspirations are tied to his boss. where are we? we're where donald trump wants us to be and that's the scary