and, look, there is no greater confirmation that a story is no longer confined to the right-wing media circles than to have the new york times come out and not only confirm the laptop and e-mails, but advance the story with the tax loan that hunter biden got. and i think there s a lot of questions morning. one, what will twitter and facebook have to say because they, obviously, didn t share howard: well, i ll tell you what they say, now it s okay. now it s been launderedded through customs. now the new york times says it s a story, but it wasn t a story at the end of 020. in that story the times reported that hunter biden took out a a loan to repay more than a million dollars in back taxes and try to avoid prosecution, but what else is urn investigation according to that piece? well, for our viewers that are new to this story if they haven t been following it, because we ve been covering it on fox. and, by the way, fox also confirmed the story that the new york post broke 17 mont
answers you wanted from him? don, we absolutely did. we didn t expect fireworks, and i know there was a great build-up to this hearing. the reason why there was a long build-up, it took a long time to secure director mueller and we absolutely had to have him, but we had a methodical building block of a story. it wasn t a story with a lot of dancing and a lot of music. mmm-hmm. but as it relates to the judiciary committee volume ii, we hammered over and over again the issues dealing with obstruction of justice. i think one of the major points was the president and his supporters constantly indicate there was no collusion, there was no conspiracy. you don t have to have an underlying crime to have a crime of obstruction of justice. so you think robert mueller undid that narrative today? i think he undid it because he even answered the question that there does not need to be a crime for there to be obstruction of justice, and obstruction of justice can be a basis for indictment
with you rather than over satellite. good to be with you. i got to say, we talked about if the democrats were going to be disciplined. i thought the democrats were very disciplined today. they were coordinated in their approach about asking substantive questions about the report and to robert mueller. the question is, did you get the answers you wanted from him? don, we absolutely did. we didn t expect fireworks, and i know there was a great build-up to this hearing. the reason why there was a long build-up, it took a long time to secure director mueller and we absolutely had to have him, but we had a methodical building block of a story. it wasn t a story with a lot of dancing and a lot of music. mmm-hmm. but as it relates to the judiciary committee volume ii, we hammered over and over again the issues dealing with obstruction of justice. i think one of the major points was the president and his supporters constantly indicate there was no collusion, there
this is a story about mail and packages. and it s also a story about people. people who rely on us every day to deliver their dreams they re handing us more than mail they re handing us their business and while we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country, we never forget. that your business is our business the united states postal service. priority: you
budget at the state department and going how could you pay for a $50,000 customized curtain for the u.n. you guys paid for it! this was under john kerry. the times did issue a correctio correction. however i do not think it s a completely fair correction. i think that the entire story should have been retracted because without nikki haley in the story, it wasn t a story and if you look at the language they use in the correction that they have, as you said that will be on the bottom of the page, they say that they created an unfair impression but really it was a completely false allegation. and as greg said, they admit in the story multiple times that this happened in 2016 and was already paid for. this idea that they use her photo saying they shouldn t have used her photo, they are sorry for that, the entire story wouldn t have existed if nikki haley wasn t the center of the story. they should retract the entire thing and rewrite it. the most revealing thing about the article and abo