financial, fiscal context we find ourselves for all sorts of different reasons, and if they do have to trim the nhs budget, is there anything left to trim? left to trim? gosh, i don t think so. we left to trim? gosh, i don t think s0- we are left to trim? gosh, i don t think s0- we are so left to trim? gosh, i don t think so. we are so stretched - left to trim? gosh, i don t think so. we are so stretched and - left to trim? gosh, i don t thinkl so. we are so stretched and that left to trim? gosh, i don t think. so. we are so stretched and that is worrying i suppose. so. we are so stretched and that is worrying i suppose- so. we are so stretched and that is worrying i suppose. there is someone at the back who worrying i suppose. there is someone at the back who has worrying i suppose. there is someone at the back who has her worrying i suppose. there is someone at the back who has her hand - worrying i suppose. there is someone at the back who has her hand up, - worrying i s
further will further advance china s military actions around taiwan. in fact, china s military actions around taiwan. infact, basically china s military actions around taiwan. in fact, basically it ll deprive taiwan of its sovereignty. professor, just on that, we ve heard from john kirby, from the usjust a little while ago in the programme, saying the us remains against taiwan s independence and it doesn t want crisis of conflict, obviously trying to de escalate the situation here. isn t this enough for the chinese? why can t theyjust here. isn t this enough for the chinese? why can t they just see this visit as a visit of a high ranking us politician? this visit as a visit of a high-ranking us politician? well, i thinkthere s high-ranking us politician? well, i think there s some high-ranking us politician? well, i i think there s some misunderstanding across that cross purpose discussions here. in the us, nancy
ratcheting up their programme, but i think it will still be a tough call. australians really do believe in the constitutional monarchy as the best way of running the country, and that is kind of separate from whether they are monarchists or not. it s just a very sensible, stable way of running the country. you just a very sensible, stable way of running the country. running the country. you can also believe in running the country. you can also believe in constitutional - running the country. you can also | believe in constitutional monarchy being a republican? i guess you just elected prime minister from the left who has a strong environmental record. prince charles also has the mental rhetoric. what do australians make of him? mental rhetoric. what do australians make of him? yes. i mental rhetoric. what do australians make of him? yes.l make of him? prince charles? yes. i thinkthere s make of him? prince charles? yes. i think there s a make of him? prince charles? yes. i th
cartographer both by training and profession before he became a priest. is there a kind of almost territorial claim built into that title? i territorial claim built into that title? 4 , ~ title? i think there is. i think there is a title? ithink there is. ithink there is a sense title? ithink there is. ithink there is a sense in title? ithink there is. ithink there is a sense in which i title? ithink there is. ithink there is a sense in which he | title? ithinkthere is. | think. there is a sense in which he and others in the russian orthodox church c ukraine, belarus, russia as part of one holy place and that they belong to one another. they talk sometimes about ukraine being a little russia, as if it is the little russia, as if it is the little brother. and there is a way almost, the opponents of the war also talk about fraternity, they talk about the fratricidal war, there is a closeness between the two countries, there is proximity, but it is how you express that. what countri
not that would prevent the automatic tax cuts from going into place. excuse me, automatic lick spendin cut what people should know is that one way or another we re going to have $1.2 trillion in reduced spending. it could either be done the ugly way, which would happen if our committee ails. or we could do it more intelligently. but we do have the opportunity, even if the committee fails, to work around the sequester so that we still have $1.2 trillion in savings over t years. but it s not done in the very draconian way that secretary panetta is referring to. now that will require work on congress pa, and some agreement. but i can t imagine that, knowing of the importance of national defense, that both democrats and republicans wouldn t find a way to work through that process so way still get to $1.2 trillion in cuts, but it doesn t all fall on defense as secretary panetta pointed out. so you don t think the defense cuts will happen? well, i thinkthere s a way to avoid that, if