Live Breaking News & Updates on Justice Scalia Didn T
Stay updated with breaking news from Justice scalia didn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Useful idiots that are going to make excuses and that are going to go against 95% of americans and say we don t need enhanced background checks to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill. we don t need bans on assault-style weapons that even justice scalia said in heller in 2008 and 2009 were not protected by the second amendment. who will be the useful idiots that will continue to do the gun lobby s business and continue to push an agenda that s not focused on gun safety. it s not even focused on gun rights because we support the second amendment, we support gun rights, we believe that the right to keep and bear arms actually means americans have the right to keep and bear arms and it has nothing do with malicious. who will be the useful idiots that will promote an agenda that s not about gun rights and safety but instead is just about the bloody bottom line? ....
Because emotional arguments often rule the day. somebody will say well, that s my constitutional right to carry around an assault-style weapon. no it s not. justice scalia didn t even say it was. well, the majority of americans are on my side. you live in a bubble. no, they don t. john, political calculus, let s talk about the political calculus here. when it comes to enhanced background checks to keep guns out of the hands of the criminally insane, to keep guns out of the hands of terrorists, to keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, 95% of americans tell pollsters they support increased background checks. when you talk about military-style weapons. look, only 4% oppose. 4% are on the side of the nra and the majority of the republican members in the house and senate. 4%. they are 4%. we are the 95%. i speak of we as myself and a ....
Involving race. you ended up having your own view of juroris prudence and your own approach to judging that was unique and sometimes to the consternation of justice scalia. we have a bond. i have a long history being told what to do. i do that well. [laughing] people i have to say what they have to say. it s a place where individuals do their work.have to say what have to say. it s a place where individuals do their work.have to say what have to say. it s a place where individuals do their work. justice scalia didn t follow me and i didn t follow him. nobody up there follows another person. laura: your philosophy is described as formalistic, rigid, strictly conservative. ....
Involving race. you ended up having your own view of juroris prudence and your own approach to judging that was unique and sometimes to the consternation of justice scalia. we have a bond. i have a long history being told what to do. i do that well. [laughing] people i have to say what they have to say. it s a place where individuals do their work.have to say what have to say. it s a place where individuals do their work.have to say what have to say. it s a place where individuals do their work. justice scalia didn t follow me and i didn t follow him. nobody up there follows another person. laura:our philosophy is described as formalistic, rigid, strictly conservative. ....
Is the only issue. but it is an issue. try to get something done if you can t get everything done. which is why the president didn t do all things. he didn t try to limit assault guns or ammunition. he didn t want to step on too many legal toes. you could argue he didn t have the ability to do those things with the existing legislation. i would disagree. the president wanted to do it. he didn t have the abilit to do it. of course he wanted to do it. he stayed within the balance of his limitations which is what we wanted him to do. what he wanted to do here is simply define guidelines. i ll redefine the definition of what a gun dealer is, so the guy that inherits his granddaddy s gun collection but it s actually a thousand guns, that s a gun dealer. that s clarifying the law within his power. ben, thank you very much for starting off this conversation, but at least making it on a man level making it okay for a man ....