husband, said in response to will you marry me? yes. but there was another unexpected twist in store for kim adams. robert told kim he d been offered an important and lucrative position in the global spy game. he talked about a job at a lighthouse, which was some sort of communication station really. in a remote part of scotland there was a lighthouse. and robert told kim that s where they would be, gathering intelligence together. monitoring russian submarines as they skulked by. they d send their dispatches to spymasters in london. so you were going to be mr. and mrs. james bond living in a lighthouse someplace. we were going to be living in a lighthouse. kim s parents had divorced and now both were remarried. she called her dad in sioux city, iowa, to tell him about her serious live-in boyfriend. i told everybody my daughter was marrying james bond. kim was shaken but not stirred by the prospect of keeping vigil in a desolate
davis got a fair trial deeptd six was the right one with. we are now joined, continue to have the live shot outside the jackson, georgia, prison, continue to show you if we can, maybe naught up on the screen, also the scene outside the supreme court that we have been watching, protesters have also gathered. joining us now is also with us, senior legal analyst jeffrey toobin and bj bernstein. jeff, in terms of the lethal injection, the process, it that itself is a process filled with controversy? these right. lethal injection was developed as a supposedly more humane alternative to electrocution and the gas chamber. but in recent years, lethal injection itself has become very controversial, not as simple al thing as someone would assume to put someone to death intra venously. many of the states use what s known as the three judge cocktail that has been problematic. some of the drugs that have been use ready not available in sufficient quantities this three-judge three-dr
officer macphail rushed to the scene to investigate, was shot and killed n two years later in 1991, troy davis was convicted for that murder based on eyewitness testimony but since davis trial, seven of the nine witnesses against him either recanted or changed their testimony raising doubts that have gone global. we have the scene outside the supreme court that we ve been watching, where protesters have also gathered. joining us now is senior legal analyst jeffrey toobin and b.j. bernstein. in terms of the lethal injection, the process, that itself is a process filled with controversy? that s right. lethal injection was developed as a supposedly more humane alternative to electrocution and the gas chamber. but in recent years, lethal injection itself has become very controversial. it is not as simple a thing as many people assume to put someone to death intravenously. many of the states use what s known as the three judge cocktail that has been problematic. some of the dru
davis trial, seven of the nine witnesses against him either recap theed or changed their testimony, raising doubts that have gone global. however, the d.a. in the case and the families the victim s family insisted all along that davis got a fair trial deeptd six was the right one with. we are now joined, continue to have the live shot outside the jackson, georgia, prison, continue to show you if we can, maybe naught up on the screen, also the scene outside the supreme court that we have been watching, protesters have also gathered. joining us now is also with us, senior legal analyst jeffrey toobin and bj bernstein. jeff, in terms of the lethal injection, the process, it that itself is a process filled with controversy? these right. lethal injection was developed as a supposedly more humane alternative to electrocution and the gas chamber. but in recent years, lethal injection itself has become very controversial, not as simple al thing as someone would assume to put s
euthanasia prevention coalition joined us. the key to the system is what s happening more and more with these court cases against families like mo s situation is the doctors are taking over the care decisions. so in these situations when in a past there may be a negotiation and a common, you know, decision for families, right now what s happening more and more are the courts are taking over and doctors are imposing their decisions upon families and that s become overly common. this case is one of the worst examples we ve seen, though. peter johnson jr. is here. is government run health care in canada taking away parents rights? yes. and unfortunately, we could have it here. baby joseph, everyone agrees is dying. the question becomes who takes on the best interest of this little boy? do his parents? keeping vigil in the hospital or does the consent and capacity board of ontario, canada. does the office of public