Kraltic Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Being impeached, these experts would say exactly the opposite of what they're saying. this is trying to find impeachable conduct against a candidate they don't like. and once you establish a precedent like this, it can be used against the next democrat who gets elected. and it will just destroy the importance of impeachment as a check and balance. if you give congress the power just to willy nilly impeach anybody they don't like because they don't think he's abusing office, that would apply to almost any president that a majority of the people in the house disagree. that's what hamilton said w...

It's brilliant, but also seen through the prism of how does it impact the political race? everything you afforded bill clinton and his attorneys, 2 1/2 weeks notice, you get to decide what date is convenient to you. the right to call witnesses, cross examine witnesses, present evidence. none of that is allowed the rebe uns in this case. >> sure, the democrats have an extraordinarily weak hand. they've tried to balance it by cheating on every possible level, making absurd demands, having the intelligence committee report come out in the evening and they -- the judiciary committee meet the next ...

The guy who had 63 million people vote for him, the guy who won by landslide, the speaker of the house calling the president of the united states an imposter, that was the attitude on display from the three witnesses that the democrats called in. they had to call them in. they didn't want to talk about the four facts you just talked about. they didn't want to talk about the five meetings where zelinsky met with senior officials in the time the aid was pause and not in one of those meetings did linking aid to any type of investigation come up. not once. they got no case, no facts. that i have t...

Entire process. and i would take and cut that into a five commercials and i would drown the country in them. because if every american understood how much turley, a constitutional expert, was destroying the democrat kraltic case, it would collapse overnight. he was one of the most effective witnesses i've ever seen. i thought it was devastating what he said. >> mr. speaker, we have had ideologues today who are known trump haters. that's what they brought in. with the exception of jonathan turley. then the schiff show, you've got hearsay, inadmissible, opinion witnesses, not admissible evidence...

Nothing about when the president becomes incapacitated. they amended it. if you want to make sure presidents can't have conversations with foreign leaders about corruption, pass a statute that makes that a crime. but you can't just make it up as you go along. and i think all three of the republicans -- the democrats made it up. now, i thought turley did a great job, but i don't think he went far enough. he basically agreed with the democrats that you can impeach if you have a case of massive abuse of power. that's just not in the constitution. you need to have one of those four criteria. and i...