Kwi Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Has admitted that he lied to the fbi. can we talk about jerry's son-in-law who seems to have access to everything december sf -- despite the fact that he actually lied. >> james clapper lied under oath. but obama was fine with it. >> flynn seems fine. lied to the fbi. >> flynn is not monetizing hiss security clearance. >> neither is clapper. >> he just did two days ago. michael flynn doesn't have access to that and he's going through the court system and yet two people who lied to congress, spied on congress and lied under oath are perfectly fine to keen monetizing their clearance and make mon...

States, obviously it's a hypothetical as you said. the hypothetical person, they wouldn't even have needed to know who the russians were. they needed to know it was a russian operation. but they didn't need to meet these people, they depart need to be involved with everything. if they agreed and said we want you to target working-class women in wisconsin and that's the age that we want. that would be joining a conspiracy. >> final subject, step back, big picture there are several different areas that we know mule certificate probing. in which do you believe the president shows the most vulnera...

But another, if i may put this on the screen. is it appropriate to use violence to prevent a speaker from speaking. 19%, let's call it one out of five of college students at america say yeah, that's fine. >> again, just to make sure it's you know accurately characterized. it was among my respondent group. and to the extent that that's representative, then that's the case. also it's important to emphasize that question was referring to an extremely offensive speaker. and i'm in no way advocating for supporting violence, but it was phrased intentionally to gauge students' reaction to the most ob...

You gave two scenarios. put the fourth slide up on the screen. and you asked them you know, which option is the appropriate option. and i'll explain, option 1 was that the university creates a positive learning environment for all students by prohibiting certain speech. option two was, that they create a learning environment where students are exposed to all types, 53%, slightly more than half said hey, please, prohibit the offensive speech. your reaction? >> my reaction is that anyone who spent time on college campuses in the last year or two, probably wouldn't find it very surprising. those ...

Disbelief in the russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign. as my colleague was quick to point out yesterday, here was the conclusion of the intelligence community assessment released in january. quote we assess russian president vladimir putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the u.s. presidential election. russia's goals were to undermine public faith in the u.s. democratic process, denigrate secretary clinton and harm her electability and potential presidency. we further assess the putin and the russian government developed a clear preference for president-elect trump...