Lab Hypotheses News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Lab hypotheses. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Lab Hypotheses Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Of covid and the geopolitical infighting is severely hindering the science. china still has not shared some of the key data from the earliest days of the pandemic, including information about the very first suspected cases. from the start its leaders have tried to control the information coming out. what is it like going into these countries? no country wants to be investigated in this way, they want their own people to do it. it is not this idea of going in, and doing parachute research, taking specimens and running. what has to be done is you have to go into a country, work with the country and together come up with hypotheses and conclusions. and remember countries can make their own decisions. there is a difficulty there if the sovereign country wants to shape what the science says. countries often want to shape what comes out. it can be very frustrating. to do an investigation ....
To include it or we don t have a report. he agreed that we could mention it in the report on the condition that we wouldn t recommend specific studies on that hypotheses, we would just leave it there. he basically suggested that, yes, there was pressure, and that is why it was characterised in that way and if it hadn t been written in as extremely unlikely, or there is no further investigation needed, then it couldn t appear on that report at all. we made it clear that the lab hypothesis is not off the table butjust out of the different ways this pandemic could have started. yeah, that it is on the bottom of our list. do you think the chinese scientists had pressure put on them from that perspective? that s quite likely because as you say, so all sars ....
International team of amazing scientists, from all over the world, went in to better understand the origins. they had a mandate to study and to learn from the chinese counterparts, what they were willing to share with them. and then you see the report that was out. the report is several hundred pages long and has a lot of information on the molecular and the animals susceptibility, and very little on the lab. it wasn t their mandate to begin with to cover that in full. they didn t have the full capacity is to do laboratory audits. they did in there and they made their assessments. clearly, there s much more work that needs to be done for the lab hypotheses. do you sort of stand by your extremely unlikely categorisation? do i stand by it? yeah. i still think. so, obviously the exact wording has gone viral. so, had we known that, then maybe that exact wording would have been a little ....
Again with the laboratory leak, if there was evidence to follow, that d be great, let s go down that pathway. if the us agencies had come with more information, terrific, let s get on with it and try to assist them. but in terms of taking it further, you then need evidence to go further. 0n the 9th of february 2020, thejoint who china mission reported its findings to the world. it concluded that a spill over from an infected animal was the most likely triggerfor the pandemic, followed by the possibility that frozen food came from another country into china, contaminated, with sars cov 2 and then a laboratory incident was at the bottom of the list of hypotheses, described as extremely unlikely. what we were hearing as a result of the investigation was that this was definitely not a laboratory related incident. that s the way that it was interpreted. we ve got to remember full access wasn t granted ....
Into the hallway and discussed how to resolve the impasse, so we could move on. that s when i said we had to include it or we don t have a report. he agreed that we could mention it in the report on the condition that we wouldn t recommend specific studies on that hypotheses, we would just leave it there. he basically suggested that yes, there was pressure, and that s why it was characterised in that way and if it hadn t been written and is extremely unlikely, or there is no further investigation needed, then it couldn t appear on that report at all. we made it clear that the lab hypotheses is not off the table but just out of the different ways this pandemic could have started yeah, that it s on the bottom of our list. do you think the chinese scientists had pressure put on them from that perspective? that s quite likely because, ....