Page 5 - Language Problem News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Bart stupak and the abortion language problem. how many votes does he represent? if he's going to be asked to vote on the senate bill with the abortion language it currently has, if he's a no vote on that bill, how many go with him? >> it's a great question. inquisitive minds want to know including speaker pelosi's office. it ranges anywhere from four to 11 maybe up to 13 but, you know, when it all comes down to what happens between now and an actual vote. the problem here is that there is no conceivable compromise other than to allow abortion language to be voted upon outside of the health ca...

The other end of the democratic party. bart stupak and the abortion language problem. how many votes does he represent? if he's going to be asked to vote on the senate bill with the abortion language it currently has, if he's a no vote on that bill how many go with him? >> a great question. inquisitive minds want to know including speaker pelosi's office. it ranges anywhere from four to 11 maybe up to 13 but, you know, when it all comes down to what happens between now and an actual vote. the problem here is that there is no conceivable compromise other than to allow abortion language to be vo...

That would ostensibly provide a foundation for single payor has its own weaknesses. yeah, congressman kucinich stands alone. >> now, there's more trouble on the other end of the democratic party. bart stupak and the abortion language problem. how many votes does he represent? if he's going to be asked to vote on the senate bill with the abortion language it currently has, if he's a no vote on that bill how many go with him? >> a great question. inquisitive minds want to know including speaker pelosi's office. it ranges anywhere from four to 11 maybe up to 13 but, you know, when it all comes do...

There was some big weakness in the law that this case had ferreted out, it was that the court had showed a really aggressive tack, just in its decision to take this case. this wasn't a case they had to take. it was basically an entire legal strategy against obamacare, an entire lawsuit against obamacare, based on a typo. it wasn't exactly a typo, but this wasn't a substantiative complaint about the obamacare law. this was basically, this whole case was basically about some descriptive language in this giantly long bill, and the language was inconsistently written between different parts of the...

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.