Page 2 - Level Playing Fields News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

We believe in level playing fields. and we believe in one another. we believe this election more than any other will impact our ability to get ahead, to raise our families, and to ensure that our kids have a higher quality of life than we do. we need a president who can get stuff done, who is going to solve the fundamental problems. [ cheers and applause ] >> we deserve a president who is going to help us improve education, protect our fresh water, clean up our drinking water, close the skills gap so we can get into higher wage jobs and, yes, help us fix the damn roads. [ applause ] >> so we i...

Protect there it sounds like protectionism is on the march again tell us what merkel is getting at exactly. i think one thing that she's really talking about here is the idea that the chinese have often a spouse open markets on their ins and in fact recently sort of in counterpoint to what trump has been espousing with protectionism they've really been pushing for open trade on the ground however the fact is they haven't been very open they still require a lot of technology transfer a lot of teaming up with chinese companies that leads to technology transfer and there's the feeling that the pl...

You know, just look at hillary's history. she's been on the receiving end of one terrible right-wing attack after another for 25 years. but she has never backed down. she doesn't whine. she doesn't run to twitter at 3:00 a.m. to call her opponents "liz lo "losers" or "dummies." she doesn't even cry that the election is rigged. no. hillary is the kind who just gets up every day and she keeps on fighting. fighting for children. fighting for women. fighting for families. fighting for health care. fighting for human rights. fighting for level playing fields. hillary fights for us! that's right. [ ...

Put it, but you heard some of my colleagues here yesterday lament the alleged activism of the current court in supposedly always ruling for the corporate interests or the interests of big business. do you agree with the president and my colleagues that judges should take into account whether a particular party is a big guy or a little guy when approaching a question of law or that one side is powerful or that one side is a corporation? >> here's what i think. i think that courts have to be level playing fields, and that everybody has to have an opportunity to go before the court, to state his ...

Sensibility. i'm not sure that's exactly the way the president would put it, but you heard some of my colleagues here yesterday lament the alleged activism of the current court in supposedly always ruling for the corporate interests or the interests of big business. do you agree with the president and my colleagues that judges should take into account whether a particular party is a big guy or a little guy when approaching a question of law? or that one side is powerful, or that one side is a corporation? >> well, here's what i think. i think that courts have to be level playing fields. and th...