Stay updated with breaking news from Lib yeah. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Economy. that s what the american people are most concerned with. fortunately of the 90 minutes allotted only ten minutes were used on the economy. other topics, garnering big chunk of time, contraception, abortion, lib yeah. not surprising, however, biden did fail on the economy over and over. on to taxes. if your ticket is elected who will pay more in taxes and who will pay less? starting with vice president biden for two minutes. middle class will pay less. people make $1 million or more will begin to contribute slightly more. eric: biden was wayoff. the obama tack plan is raise taxes op people and businesses earning over $250,000. not a million dollars as joe biden said right there. blatant lie used to dupe the american middle class. andrea: who do you think works for a lot of the small business owners? the middle class. when the small business owners get taxed they have to cut down the workforces. who do they fire? the middle class. ....
Or he is not willing to get out there and take a hisk. i think it does, as jay carney was suggesting speak to other public concerns about his character and leadership ability. bret: charles? i m intrigued by carney s logic. he says because the president killed bin laden we should advocate him illegal aliens. this demonstrated leadership and undid narrative about the indecisiveness. if you look objectively at what he has done in foreign affairs in iran, syria and libya with the russian reset it s record of dithering. on the other hand, it pales in significance in the popular imagination, because nobody begins when bombs landed on lib yeah. ....
Lib yeah. they remember where they were when they heard of bin laden s death. it has emotional failure. it does address the character issue. it will be important you hear how carney tried to flip negative to a positive. he looks indecisive and he is looking so deep, so long, in to the strategic future that what appears of iterring is real strategic depth and leadership. it reminds me of the crazy of a fanatic follow trodsky who said he was such a visionary not one of his prophecies have yet come true. it s about in the same league as that. bret: bill? good to know i can discuss trodsky for a while but i ll stick with president obama. he acts decisively and will confirm his newly acquired reputation for decisiveness. on immigration reform, what struck me about the quote, not ....
what about the handling of by this president of events in the middle east? is it your view that it s in america s vital security interests to remove moammar gadhafi from power in libya? i think that it s been troubling, the way that the president has responded. for instance, in libya, during the unrest, we had at least 600 americans who were there. the chirn chinese were in the process of removing 12,000 chinese, while the americans were waiting to be removed from lib yeah. i think recently in germany, we saw two military soldiers killed by alleged terrorists this week, and i think the president s response, at minimum, was lacking. we need to send very strong signals. i m concerned about the signals the president has sent. congresswoman, my question my question is it in me america s vital interest to remove moammar gadhafi from power? well, that question, i think, is one that as as defense ....
Throughiot the middle east. i know that you re going to spend some time on that this morning. i guess my question is what do you think are some of the options there in that region for the u.s.? it really depends. what s been interesting is we ve tended to link all of these countries together as we ve watch progressively protests grow from tunisia to egypt, but there have been very different outcomes, why? because they are very different countries with different complexities both within the socioeconomic mix in those countries and the leaders. the u.s. certainly feels as if it has and it has used influence on the king of bahrain to get him to back off because there had been, as you know, a huge crack don on some deaths on some protesters. he seems to have backed off, so the u.s. has some leverage there, but you look at a place like lib yeah, and you can come out and say we re for protests and open up a society, but our ability to influence moammar gadhafi is pretty limited. so sometim ....