You can see that live here on cspan at 7 00 p. M. Eastern. Then, sunday on cspan, utah congressman rob bishop, the chairman of the Natural Resources committee, hell talk about puerto ricos debt crisis, the u. S. Territory is 70 billion in debt and has already missed millions of dollars in debt payments. Congressman bishop will answer questions about efforts in congress to help puerto rico restructure its debt. Newsmakers on 10 00 a. M. And 6 00 p. M. Eastern on cspan unday. Book tv has 48 hours of nonfiction books and authors every weekend and here are some programs to watch for this weekend. On saturday at 10 00 p. M. Eastern on afterwards, don watkins, author of equal is unfair. Don the reason i say unequality is not a problem, its not a concern of how much money do you have but how did you get it . Did you get it through something that is fair or through a process that is unfair . And when you try to equalize people that earn honestly, thats what were challenging and saying thats no
Terabytes of data, the newspaper needed help and called in the journalism troops. With such a large number of people going to the database, they needed to agree on a common strategy for collaboration and for parsing out the research, as well as the joint process of holding off until everyone was ready. This is something foreign to american media. We are not used to co honoring editors. We will talk about some of the work and the findings. It is sponsored by the journalism institute, the nonprofit arm of the National Press club. Left elcome, from i im sorry. From my right, will fitzgibbon, a reporter from the National Consortium. To my last, ms. Walker, the Deputy Director of the National Consortium of journalists. And kevin hall, the chief economics correspondent for mcclatchy. Thank you so much tom and the press club for this invitation. What an honor to be here. So, yes, were going to talk about collaboration across borders. When we think about investigative journalism, sometimes thi
Honestly, we at the club had no idea what they were talking about. Until now. That was one of the first meetings of the consortium of journalists who are investigating what we now call the Panama Papers. Documents some 11. 5 were late to a german leaked to a german newspaper. I am sorry. I got close. Possibly the biggest leak in history. Mossack fonseca, with 2. 6 terabytes of data, the newspaper needed help and called in the journalism troops. With such a large number of people going to the database, they needed to agree on a common strategy for collaboration and for parsing out the research, as well as the joint process of holding off until everyone was ready. This is something foreign to american media. We are not used to co honoring editors. We will talk about some of the work and the findings. It is sponsored by the journalism institute, the nonprofit arm of the National Press club. Left elcome, from i im sorry. From my right, will fitzgibbon, a reporter from the National Consorti
We are here to stay. We will be bigger and better than you can ever imagine. The night clubs employees vowed to reopen the club. The go fund me site to help the victims has reached almost 3 million since it opened on sunday. We continue our Team Coverage of the terror in orlando with leanne gregg in orlando with more on the shooting that left 50 people dead. Reporter good morning. Investigators are continuing to collect evidence, the crime scene is just down the street. They have started an extensive recreation of that crime scene, so that they can better understand what happened. Theyre also learning more about the gunman, omar mateen. Reports that he had sent messages using gay Online Dating sites and that he had been to the bar several times people had seen him in the place. The weapons he used he purchased legally a little over a week before the attack from a ft. Pierce gun store. Mateen was on a federal watch list. While under investigation for making comments about terrorist conn
Kind of a genre that keeps growing in literature, both fiction and nonfiction. We had a panel like this three years ago, and it really was intended to celebrate the fact that the Supreme Court is, seems to be the subject of more and more books of all kinds. And judging by the corner of my desk where i stack books about the court that have come in from publishers, the genre has only increased since the last event. So we thought wed do this again especially since the Supreme Court is in the news more than ever these days. Im especially pleased with the panel thats been assembled this evening. Ive written about all of these fine authors and mentioned all of them in my annual lists of the top ten books for the Supreme Court officionado in your life. Ive praised each one of them not just because of their books, but because their books, each in their own way, have shed new light on the Supreme Court which sorely needs more light. So ill introduce each of them briefly, then start the discussi