Loemen Amendment News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And those provisions were men to be interpreted over time, to be applied to new situations and new factual context. the fourth amendment is a great example of this. it says that there shall be no unreasonable searches and seizures. what's unreasonable? that's a question. the framers could have given a whole primer on police practices. you know. which searches were reasonable? which searches weren't reasonable? lots of different rules for saying that. you about they didn't do that. i think that they didn't do that because of this incredible wisdom that they had that they knew that the world was...

$300 million if dean kagan's policy was not reversed. isn't that a fact? >> senator sessions, we did what dod asked for because we have always tried to be in compliance with the sole loemen amendment, thought we were, and when dod long held that we were and dod came back to us and said, no, notwithstanding the third circuit decision, we maintain our insistence that you are out of compliance, we said, okay. >> in fact, you were punishing the military. the protest that you had, that you spoke to on campus was at the very time in the next building or one or two buildings nearby. the military were...

Sessions. that's the point i was trying to make, that -- you take the fourth amendment and you say there's -- unreasonable searches and seizures and that provision stays the same unless it is amended. that's the provision. then the question is what counts as an unreasonable search and seizure and new cases come before the court and the court tries to think about to the ex-step one can glean any meaning from the text itself, from the original intent, from the precedents, from the history, and from the principles embedded in the precedent, and the court sort of step by step by step one case at a...