sad to see it go. likely will see in the airfora few sad to see it go. likely will see in the air for a few more years to come. . , the air for a few more years to come. . . , .,, ~ ., come. and what will it be most known for? it was really _ come. and what will it be most known for? it was really the _ come. and what will it be most known for? it was really the jet _ come. and what will it be most known for? it was really the jet that - for? it was really the et that revolutionised for? it was really the et that revolutionised travel _ for? it was really the jet that revolutionised travel in - for? it was really the jet that revolutionised travel in the l for? it was really the jet that - revolutionised travel in the 1970s revolutionised travel in the 19705 and on. it was the luxuryjet — you saw the stairs inside, the bar that really made flying a luxury instead of those old world war ii era design planes that we had before then. it had two isles, which was revolutionary, and it could hold almost 500 people. it was just an amazingly large jet almost 500 people. it was just an amazingly largejet and almost 500 people. it was just an amazingly large jet and was fun to see it in the air. truth? amazingly large et and was fun to see it in the air.— see it in the air. why is it now bein: see it in the air. why is it now being stepped _ see it in the air. why is it now being stopped from _ see it in the air. why is it now| being stopped from remaining see it in the air. why is it now. being stopped from remaining in production?— being stopped from remaining in roduction? ., _, . . production? from the commercial side, it s production? from the commercial side. it s not _ production? from the commercial side, it s not feasible _ production? from the commercial side, it s not feasible for- production? from the commercial side, it s not feasible for airlines l side, it s not feasible for airlines to fly a plane that big. they want to fly a plane that big. they want to fly a plane that big. they want to fly smaller planes like an airbus 321 or boeing 737, where they can do even more frequency. it also takes a lot of fuel, the newer planes are
along equipment. some of this may also be a _ along equipment. some of this may also be a negotiating tactic with our allies — also be a negotiating tactic with ourallies. germany also be a negotiating tactic with our allies. germany was being very reluctant— our allies. germany was being very reluctant to — our allies. germany was being very reluctant to go alone in providing tanks _ reluctant to go alone in providing tanks the — reluctant to go alone in providing tanks. the us was reluctant to send tanks _ tanks. the us was reluctant to send tanks for— tanks. the us was reluctant to send tanks for the same reasons that were discussed- _ tanks for the same reasons that were discussed— our tanks maybe didn t work— discussed— our tanks maybe didn t work as— discussed— our tanks maybe didn t work as well on this terrain as the german— work as well on this terrain as the german tanks did. but eventually through— german tanks did. but eventually through negotiation and agreeing to send some, we got the equipment from germany— send some, we got the equipment from germany that needed to get there. theres— germany that needed to get there. there s a _ germany that needed to get there. there s a lot of things at play here. — there s a lot of things at play here. but— there s a lot of things at play here, but i m with the lieutenant colonel. — here, but i m with the lieutenant colonel, we should not be ruling any eventuality— colonel, we should not be ruling any eventuality out. and colonel, we should not be ruling any eventuality out.— eventuality out. and we ve seen the hu . e eventuality out. and we ve seen the huge economic— eventuality out. and we ve seen the huge economic impact _ eventuality out. and we ve seen the huge economic impact of— eventuality out. and we ve seen the huge economic impact of ukraine i eventuality out. and we ve seen the huge economic impact of ukraine -| huge economic impact of ukraine — when you travel to parts of the world that are not in europe, there is a different perspective in a different view as to how the western alliance should act here. what s yoursense alliance should act here. what s your sense on this? is there a fear about western escalation and support for ukraine? ~ ,,., , ., ~ for ukraine? absolutely, and i think the bi est for ukraine? absolutely, and i think the biggest thing —
using a fraction of the fuel that a 747 using a fraction of the fuel that a 7a7 does. and there s just been better replacements over the last couple years, like the boeing triple seven —— 777. you look at the airbus 380- it seven —— 777. you look at the airbus 380— it stopped production and... in 380— it stopped production and... in terms of what aeroplanes are having to deal with now, you rejust outside dallas where there s been pretty grim and cold there. is the industry developing planes which could deal with these more extreme climates seen as a result of climate change? climates seen as a result of climate chance? . , climates seen as a result of climate chance? . v . climates seen as a result of climate chance? . , . climates seen as a result of climate chanue? ., , ., , ., change? that s a good question, there s a lot _ change? that s a good question, there s a lot of _ change? that s a good question, there s a lot of movement - change? that s a good question, | there s a lot of movement toward sustainable fuel. a big jet like a 747 sustainable fuel. a big jet like a 7a7 needed a massive runway to land on, only going to the biggest airports. but the real push has been for the reliability and sustainability in aeroplanes, and
where admission goes on a long time, a lot of lives lost on both sides, the global damage continues —— where a mission goes on, and no site is victorious. without more power, zelensky says he needs 300 more tanks and is zelensky says he needs 300 more tanks and . .., zelensky says he needs 300 more tanks and , ., , ., , tanks and is calling for planes. gall it would _ tanks and is calling for planes. gall it would take _ tanks and is calling for planes. gall it would take a _ tanks and is calling for planes. gall it would take a lot more i tanks and is calling for planes. i gall it would take a lot more than that to carve out a viable counteroffensive, especially if you re even thinking about this summer and spring. that s one of the things i ve been talking about since the beginning, to include the abrams or the challenger, or the lampard tanks from germany, there s a lot of vehicles, but building combat power is a problem. just like aircraft, there is this mentality that people think that nato equipment equals nato capability, and if you caring can get it they can do everything a nato ally would. they ll be very