Loyalty Demand News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Say this is a deal breaker for me? i'm not going to support the president. i'm talking about president trump supporters. at what point are we going to be like enough is enough? calling a black woman a dog is my line. >> there's no line. >> there needs to be a line. >> one other thing, two things in terms of the mueller investigation that could be interesting. in her book she write it is firing was all about comey's rejection of trump's loyalty demand. i never thought he would go through with it. that's something that bob mueller's team is going to be interested in. this other thing, she talks ...

Activities. if it's unclassified to get in open session. i don't know if any legal or traditional basis for them with holding this information from the committee today. >> i appreciate all of you hanging out with us tonight. thank you so much. to robert kosta, to ashley parker, to jeremy bash. i want to show you an l.a. times headline that william randolph hurst himself would look back on and perhaps be happy with. that's how the "l.a. times" is portraying it. trump's loyalty demand.

Thank you so much. to robert kosta, to ashley parker, to jeremy bash. i want to show you an l.a. times headline that william randolph hurst himself would look back on and perhaps be happy with. we have it, i swear we have it. i just saw it. anyway, we'll come back. there it is. that's how the l.a. times are portraying tomorrow's testimony. trump's loyalty demand. a viewers's guide. hey ron! they're finally taking down that schwab billboard. oh, not so fast, carl. ♪ oh no. schwab, again? index investing for that low? that's three times less than fidelity... ...and four times less than vanguar...

Traditional basis for them with holding this information from the committee today. >> i appreciate all of you hangint with us tonight. thank you so much. to robert kosta, to ashley parker, jeremy bash. i want to show you an l.a. times headline that william randolph hurst himself would look back on and perhaps be happy with. we have it, i swear we have it. i just saw it. anyway, we'll come back. there it is. that's how the l.a. times are portraying tomorrow's testimony. trump's loyalty demand. a viewers's guide.

You respond to that? >> well, i agree with jeff. i will say that if that were the only conversation, as troubling as it is, if there had been no firing at the end of this, no loyalty demand at the beginning of it. if you didn't have a whole pattern, you'd have a legal argument that trump has the constitutional right to direct investigations but the pattern is what takes it out of the argument which you're hearing from commentators about trump's right to direct comey. the pattern takes it out of that and moves us into the land of obstruction because of the test, brooke, corrupt intent. and i th...