Mainstream Interpretation News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Let's just say the majority of the country does not want roe versus wade to end. i would hope that the mainstream interpretation of the constitution would be moving away from this originalist point of view, from this textualist point of view, saying we have to look at the words and think about what the framers would have thought. frankly, the framers weren't particularly friends to black people, particularly to black women. so i'm not particularly interested in looking at the constitution from that framework. and i think that it is bizarre that we have to pretend that that's what we need to do...

Owner, that wouldn't say he was cabinet secretary. would that violate the conflict of interest law? >> if he put all of the ownership to somebody else, i don't think he would be as much in the cross hairs. the future fate of that company has a property interest wouldn't be his. what we have from the tweets and i interviewed several people about it, the mainstream interpretation is he is talking about who runs the company and not who owns it. divestment would be selling the companies or selling the ones in direct businesslike the post office hotel and other companies in direct business perhaps ...