Making Tapes News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Making tapes. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Making Tapes Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Catanese, it sounds like this is not case closed. well, i don t think so. because the president, you know, it s all about trying to parse his words, what did he really mean when he said, you know, drop the case on michael flynn. was that a threat? i mean, frankly, this could be up to a grand jury panel to decide what the president was meaning of these tweets. and i think, you know, if you re adam schiff, you want to get exactly to the bottom on what was his intent to suggest there could be tapes out there. did that mean that someone else in the administration suggested to him that they were taping conversations and he didn t know about it? did that mean that he was interested in taping conversations? or was it simply a threat to the fbi director to say, what i mentioned before, watch what you say because i may have you recorded and i may be able to counter what you say in public. and i think that may be the most reasonable explanation for why he came out and suggested tapes, ....
We are. i don t think we ever thought or i never thought that there were tapes. it didn t seem like a serious allegation. what i do think the potential consequences could be is potential intimidation, potential witness tampering, which is a federal crime, saying to the fbi director, hey, you may not want to go here because i ve got you recorded. i may have you word for word so you better get your story straight when you re explaining it. this could, i mean, i m not a lawyer, but i think you might see some speculation on that front, whether it builds well, we had a lawyer on, let me get right to it and he said you re absolutely right. this would fall in that purview as potential for that. but let s think about when we saw the president last night in that sort of campaign-style rally in iowa, and what he was talking about, this is i have a broader point, you know, he brought up this, you know, immigration, which has been on the books since, like, 1996, it s not new. he was talking ....
We saw him in the rose garden saying it is indeed nonbinding. we talked about solar panels on the wall. when you have a president putting all of this out there and then tweeting this bomb but not doing interviews and not, you know, doing briefings on camera, we can t push him. where s the accountability? well, he s throwing everything at the wall, really. you just mentioned three or four different items. now you ve got a health care bill that is sitting in the senate and now we re back to tapes and james comey and russia. it doesn t seem like there s a concerted communications strategy. and frankly, that s a whole completely other story about who s really running the communications department and who is going to run the communications document. i think this shows a complete flaw, a direct flaw of a communications strategy, what message you want to drive on any single day. i think the iowa rally, you know, it did i think that does help the president to put him out in the crowds that ....
We of course broadcast the entire briefing because you should be able to hear what this white house is telling reporters and telling the public about what s going on. but this briefing was pretty much held in the dark. there were lights on in the briefing room but the cameras were not allowed inside the briefing. it s the latest example of this white house being resistant to transparency but good news, if you want to hear from the president, he is giving his first interview in almost six weeks, giving it to fox and friends, which is a pro-trump show and one question i d like him to be asked is are you going to start making tapes now. you didn t record comey. are you going to start recording people in the oval office. it will be curious to see what he says on this issue in that interview tomorrow. sean, here s my question to you. the white house s source talking to jeff says in addition to the president being amused is that this tapes episode is what led to a special counsel and this ....
Something he said 41 days ago. maybe this was all deliberate and orchestrate and had strategic, but it just feels to me like something a lot less than that. clearly this will be viewed in two different ways, in the media world, through a media lens, pro-trump media will play this as a press overreaction. but i think for the rest of the country, it s another example of that kind of chaos inside the white house. do we have mark? because i think there is an important legal piece of all of this. mark, you re with me. let s throw the tweet back up. this is the original tweet, may 12. before i ask you this question. this was what sort of got a lot of this started. james comey better hope that there are no tapes of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press. that was just after he fired james comey which sort of led to all of this. my question to you, circ sir, w comes to obstruction of justice, was this intimidation, would this fall under that purview. in my opinion, yes, ....