Making Tapes News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Catanese, it sounds like this is not case closed. >> well, i don't think so. because the president, you know, it's all about trying to parse his words, what did he really mean when he said, you know, drop the case on michael flynn. was that a threat? i mean, frankly, this could be up to a grand jury panel to decide what the president was meaning of these tweets. and i think, you know, if you're adam schiff, you want to get exactly to the bottom on what was his intent to suggest there could be tapes out there. did that mean that someone else in the administration suggested to him that they were...

We are. i don't think we ever thought or i never thought that there were tapes. it didn't seem like a serious allegation. what i do think the potential consequences could be is potential intimidation, potential witness tampering, which is a federal crime, saying to the fbi director, hey, you may not want to go here because i've got you recorded. i may have you word for word so you better get your story straight when you're explaining it. this could, i mean, i'm not a lawyer, but i think you might see some speculation on that front, whether it builds -- >> well, we had a lawyer on, let me get r...

We saw him in the rose garden saying it is indeed nonbinding. we talked about solar panels on the wall. when you have a president putting all of this out there and then tweeting this bomb but not doing interviews and not, you know, doing briefings on camera, we can't push him. where's the accountability? >> well, he's throwing everything at the wall, really. you just mentioned three or four different items. now you've got a health care bill that is sitting in the senate and now we're back to tapes and james comey and russia. it doesn't seem like there's a concerted communications strategy. and...

We of course broadcast the entire briefing because you should be able to hear what this white house is telling reporters and telling the public about what's going on. but this briefing was pretty much held in the dark. there were lights on in the briefing room but the cameras were not allowed inside the briefing. it's the latest example of this white house being resistant to transparency but good news, if you want to hear from the president, he is giving his first interview in almost six weeks, giving it to fox and friends, which is a pro-trump show and one question i'd like him to be asked is...

Something he said 41 days ago. maybe this was all deliberate and orchestrate and had strategic, but it just feels to me like something a lot less than that. clearly this will be viewed in two different ways, in the media world, through a media lens, pro-trump media will play this as a press overreaction. but i think for the rest of the country, it's another example of that kind of chaos inside the white house. >> do we have mark? because i think there is an important legal piece of all of this. mark, you're with me. let's throw the tweet back up. this is the original tweet, may 12. before i as...