Mark Geragos Two News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Unclear. but i think again to mark's point, reading ruling here, they say you cannot provide life-sustaining treatment to someone who is dead. and this woman is dead. and that's really where the judge sort of came down on this. >> and i want to also add to this -- >> hang on. i want to make this point. >> sonny go ahead. >> when you look at the one-page order what the judge said i'm also not ruling on the constitutionality of the law. and then i feel like we're in sort of stage one again. because it is unclear, the constitutionality is unclear. >> the judge did say brain-dead is did here. that...

Fetal heartbeat and the judge ruled she should be unplugged. you have the situation now just happening again in 2014. and we just don't have any guidance, any clarity. and it's just -- i think it's heart breaking, i think it's tragic. we're going to see this case again and again and again in texas. >> mark, you're shaking your head here. let me put this to you. not only did the judge agree with the family and now apparently the hospital that marlise is brain-dead but that the hospital also said something which frankly surprised me. they came out and agreed that the fetus wasn't viable. and it ...

Acknowledged she is brain-dead. there is no chance she would have ever been saved at any point, and the condition of the fetus is simply not viable. there is no way this fetus would survive on its own. it was rather graphic and gruesome testimony to hear the conditions of not only marlise munoz but the fetus as well. the hospital says they had no case law, no legislative history, anything to rely on. they say they were following the statute which they believe was intended to protect the life of the unborn. and lawyers say that had the law said that all of this would have been terminated if the...

Law is so unclear and open to interpretation that we're going to see this same tragic situation again, mark, just like we saw in 1999. and the judge needed to provide clarity and failed to do so. a missed opportunity. >> the judge gave clarity. he didn't have to write an extensive opinion. because other than you, sonny, and a couple of other people who apparently can't read the english language -- >> a lot of other lawyers for the hospital. >> the lawyers for the hospital were getting paid because the hospital is billing away and is going to -- they may appeal because are going to continue to ...