Mcgann Doesn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Mcgann doesn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Mcgann Doesn T Today - Breaking & Trending Today
the white house counsel did not understand why the department of justice was concerned. to be fair to mr. mcgann, i think the issue that he raised, he wasn t clear on, was why we cared that michael flynn had lied to the vice president and others. why that was a matter essentially i think that s clear. within d.o.j. jurisdiction. i think that s so clear. and we have mcgann doesn t understand what s wrong with this? yates was also asked about any evidence she may have seen that the trump campaign was clu colluding with russia. miss yates, do you have any evidence, are you aware of any evidence that would subject that in the 2016 campaign anybody in the trump campaign colluded with the russian government or intelligence services in an improper fashion? and senator, my answer to that question would require me to reveal classified ....
Security matters that come under the purview of the national security council. it wasn t until the washington post revealed the nature of his deessential that the white house turned around and fired him. not because he was compromising national security but because he had lied to the vice president. in fact, he was, as sally yates warned a clear and present danger. matthew, is there a serious case to be made that we still would not have known about this if 2 story hadn t leaked to the washington post, if that hadn t been the way it got out? i think there is absolutely no reason to believe based on what we know that the white house would have ever fired mike flyn it s clear they only fired him once it became public. and now when you look and go back and reconstruct these events and look at the way they rolled out as she explained today. a meeting with mcgann on the 26th, then on the 27th of january. the had a phone call on the 30th. she was going to pry him with the underlying e ....
Problemate it in and of itself. secondly, we told him we felt like the vice president and others were entitled to know that the information that they were conveying to the american people wasn t true. and additionally, that we weren t the only ones that knew all of this. that the russians also knew about what general flynn had done, and the russians also knew that general flynn had misled the vice president and others. and that created a compromise situation a situation where the national security adviser essentially could be blackmailed by the russians. sally yates was also questioned several times today about the reactions she got from all of this from white house counse veteran.c. lawyeron mcgahn. i have a question that keeps annoying me that mr. mcgann asked of you, is there wrong with one white house official ....
Would not have known about this if 2 story hadn t leaked to the washington post, if that hadn t been the way it got out? i think there is absolutely no reason to believe based on what we know that the white house would have ever fired mike flynn. it s clear they only fired him once it became public. and now when you look and go back and reconstruct these events and look at the way they rolled out as she explained today. a meeting with mcgann on the 26th, then on the 27th of january. thej had a phone call on the 30th. she was going to pry him with the underlying evidence which we believe are the transcripts of flynn s call with the russian ambassador. that s the same day she got fired. and ealways before had been led to believe and did believe she was fired because she refused to defend the immigration order in court. now when you look at the fact she was aage tant calling for something to happen with mike flynn. the white house didn t want to do that, they fond a way to remove thea ....
andy, as we kinds of do at the end of the day, what does it all mean? does it mean that trump knew that mike flynn had lied to his vice president? does any of this mean that absent the washington post leak and subsequent report, mike flynn would still be at 109 days in, the national security adviser? i m not sure about the answer to that question. we don t know. we know that mcgann knew. we know that other white house officials knew. i don t know yet if they told donald trump and he for 18 days did nothing with the information or they didn t tell him. either way it leads to more questions. one thing i wanted to add to what brian also said, i think the white house wants to move on from this. sean spicer will have to answer our questions about this tomorrow but i was just talking to a white house official on my way over here and they are not planning any sort of offense other than sean addressing this at the briefing. i think they would rather put this behind them. the president tw ....