and another thing too that a lot of reporters seem to have had some trouble with was the cost associated. so when you wanted to look up some documents, it cost $25 per hour for a researcher, so that became quite an expense in some cases. cal borchers and david corn, thanks for joining me tonight. sure thing. a pleasure. coming up, michele bachmann has gone too far for the republican establishment and now it s bachmann versus john mccain. and guess whose side newt gingrich is on? and in the rewrite tonight, the nra continues to fight for freedom. the freedom for american mass murderers to not have to reload before firing a hundred bullets. [ man ] ever year, sophia and i
magazines to ten bullets. and so if you re an aspiring mass murderer here in california and you decide tonight to obtain your killing tools legally, as our most recent mass murderers have done, you will be forced to reload after your first ten bullets, and if you try doing that in a packed movie theater, i promise you, you will not finish reloading. you will be taken down by the freedom of the people in that theater to attack you the second you have to stop firing and reload. the ten-bullet clip is about the freedom to stop mass murderers after they ve fired ten shots, instead of a hundred. wayne lapierre doesn t want you to have that freedom. wayne lapierre wants you to be stuck in your theater seats, while the mass murderer fires another 90 bullets at you.
we, the majority, see the soul of the nation, of our individual freedom, and we see it on the brink of being destroyed, and gun owners are answering the call, all across this country, to fight back. to save america. the nra s mouthpieces in congress insist that it s all about freedom. it s really an issue of freedom. and you know that whenever someone brings up the hundred-round ammo clip that was used in our most recent mass murd murder, the defenders of mass murderers right to use hundred-round ammo clips will talk about freedom. let me ask you, i mean, we re not talking about handguns. does something that would limit magazines that can carry a hundred rounds, would that infringe on the constitutional
you have your idea of summer fun, and we have ours. now during the summer event get an exceptionally engineered mercedes-benz for an exceptional price. but hurry, this offer ends july 31st. freedom s just another word for the ability to fire 100 bullets in a crowded movie theater. that s what the nra thinks and that s next. in the rewrite. rance claim. [ voice of dennis ] switch to allstate. their claim service is so good, now it s guaranteed. [ normal voice ] so i can trust em. unlike randy. are you in good hands?
it on the brink of being destroyed, and gun owners are answering the call, all across this country, to fight back. to save america. the nra s mouthpieces in congress insist that it s all about freedom. it s really an issue of freedom. and you know that whenever someone brings up the hundred-round ammo clip that was used in our most recent mass murder murder, the defenders of mass murderers right to use hundred-round ammo clips will talk about freedom. let me ask you, i mean, we re not talking about handguns. does something that would limit magazines that can carry a hundred rounds, would that in infringe on the constitutional right? i believe so. people will talk about lethal weapons, that could be the discussion you could have.