Rosenhouse: Appealing to the Unwashed Middle
Rosenhouse’s book is objectively bad. It purports to be a critique of mathematics as used by ID proponents and of my mathematical work in particular.
Stay updated with breaking news from Michael Behe. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Rosenhouse’s book is objectively bad. It purports to be a critique of mathematics as used by ID proponents and of my mathematical work in particular.
In Africa, having the devolutionary mutation that leaves an elephant tuskless renders the creature of no interest to elephant-slaying ivory poachers.
Dr. Behe says that his skepticism toward neo-Darwinism stemmed purely from his scientific research.
Intelligent design’s scientific program can, at least in part, be viewed as an attempt to unmask Darwinist credulity.
As a fellow mathematician, I would have liked to see from Rosenhouse a vigorous and insightful discussion of my ideas.