Page 3 - Military Consequence News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Putin staying relevant. it's not a big deal, is not going to change the course of anything, but he is preventing anything else having a narrative of positivity in regard to ukraine.— positivity in regard to ukraine. ., ., positivity in regard to ukraine. ., . ~' ukraine. roger, what you think, is this about _ ukraine. roger, what you think, is this about the _ ukraine. roger, what you think, is this about the narrative i is this about the narrative here and putin taking control of that again? think it is an attempt break ukrainian morale and as mike pointed out, it's the opposite. i've been ...

Security architecture to pre-1997 when so many formerly eastern bloc countries joined the european union, joined nato, and became part of that western democratic bloc. and it's that western democratic bloc i think that ultimately is the existential threat seen by vladimir putin and ultimately covertly, in a sense, his motivation for invading ukraine. it would also mean that the international rules-based order is ripped up by at least a former superpower, a nuclear power, would demonstrate that it is possible without a great deal of severe military consequence to invade a neighbor in an unprovo...

Defeated. not the end of jihadism or the islamic ideology but the defeat of a cruel and dangerous element. arthel: i'm getting a prees a s release here, saying the he coalition congratulates the forces, the elimination of the self proclaimed territorial caliphate in the river valley, syria as well. so to what ryan was reporting, does this mean that isis now will turn up the heat on their rhetoric and spreading their ideology? >> i think they'll certainly try and do that, since they are precluded from establishing a caliphate now. but there's a consequence to defeat. it's not just a military co...

Approximate but maybe intentionally not crossing the line of an overt threat. >> well, it sounds a lot like what we have heard from the north korean regime over the years. i'm not sure how different it is. the president in some ways kind of walked himself into a trap by suggesting that even a rhetoric althreat from the regime in north korea would be grounds for military action. ut know now, some of his aids later sort of cleared that up or cleaned it up a little bit, suggesting that, withel, it's the generals who are making the threats, not the leader himself. we're going to hear the kind of r...

Korea. perhaps as people listen and liking the fact he's maybe a little off from the trump administration, because he does represent a different path for that country at this point. >> and i think it's important to think about what trump is talking about. military options are on the table. that's much easier said than done. >> right. >> he clearly wants to project a strength, you know, took a military consequence to what happened to the gassing in syria. talking about threatening that again. if it happens again there. now talking about military options in korea. this is -- are we going to end ...