this in context. before a trial happens, you don t have trial by ambush in this country. both sides, whether it be a criminal or as this trial is a civil trial, a process of discovery. and in that process, both sides are allowed to make requests. when you step into the courtroom, everyone should be conversant with the facts, the issues, the circumstances, the text messages, the email, the surveillance, it should not be a surprise. in this case, again, in context, those text messages were asked for. they were asked for a long time ago and they were told that they didn t exist, that there are no such text messages relating to the issue of sandy hook communications at all. bingo. it was a lie. why? because apauparently in a mista, those messages were sent to the attorneys representing the family in error indicating that not only, jim, do text messages exist, but two years worth of text messages exist to different parties regarding different