Stay updated with breaking news from Money in. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
we cannot afford these policies nor are they ever going to happen. the reality as i mentioned before when we increased the national debt and spending, the very families are the ones who get hurt. they end up crowding out national investment. >> republicans aren't getting better so they're not getting, it's like both sides have lost site of basic math. >> and that's up to republicans to articulate those points. i don't disagree with you, neal. >> how do you take care of the middle class? >> they're getting squeezed under obama. >> i think we're about to stop. we've saved a lot of time. you should never do that. as a host i should never either. >> it's more fun in the democratic debate. >> thank you very, very much. i know i made a big deal of this but it's money in, money out.
contrary event apart from the fact that when you pour the money in, it leaves no trace. look what happened to the seminole piece of social legislation. the 1996 be a abolition of welfare as entitlement signed by president clinton. next six years liberals were screaming this is going to throw kids into the street. will cause dessubstitution a spike in poverty the poverty rate for black children declined from 41.5% since records have been kept. that's because when -- this is a lesson we learned in the 80's and the 90's when we saw the results of the war on poverty, when you pour money in, and you sort of reinforce the rotten and corrupt and obsolete structures, you are not only don't do any good, you
two years of college if it's community college -- >> you're saying community college now and the next step, regular college -- tell you this, young lady you can have the rich taxed at 100% and it wouldn't keep our social programs going for another five years. so where are you getting your money after that? >> i don't think so. if you invest in this -- >> there's no money! >> the more people who have jobs -- >> creative ways to spend more money. >> people have jobs, they can pay more taxes. it's under social programs and we're not in debt. we're looking at it from different perspectives here. >> i'm looking at it from real math. money in, money out. i'm looking at that the rich and poor alike are saddled with debt. and these kids are going to be saddled with it as well. >> i'm one of these kids. and i can't even think about the other options -- >> you know why we can't think
free trade between the two countries, good. in the 1990s, briefly liberalized when on it's rocks. soon as the castro brothers got their money in, shut down. freezes assets, dictator hship d oh precision as usual. this is bailout of a corrupt regime. >> aren't you upset, john, no concessions given from the castro have a regime to us? >> no. give them credit. putting sanctions down elevated them needlessly, should have ignored them. were he works have been out by now. an excuse. open it up to them. >> last word from john. coming up, after the ball drops, our informers say two stocks will pop.
nothing to do with ukraine, but the administration says the imf reforms absolutely have to do -- >> that's right. >> -- with ukraine. >> that's right. >> are you able to explain that? >> yes. yes. so, what is being proposed is that we switch some money from one account that we have at the imf to another account to be able to help quickly a more general fund that we're giving money to to make sure that the quota for ukraine is increased. increasing the quota means we can help it more and we can help it more rapidly. if we don't, that means that our standing within the imf is compromised. of course, we still have a large voting share, but we become less and less credible. we made the commitment in 2010 to this reform so this was put in place, this fund, that we have money in, that we would like to shift money to, was for emergencies. it was for the 2009 crisis. so, don't you think it's about time that we shift it back? and this would have given us the
>> and it would be -- if is was on broadway it would be slapstick, maybe vaudeville. it is so amazing, and the american public to see this over and over again, the inability of people associated with the administration, just to have an honest conversation. they talk about honest dialogue. lois lerner, tell us what happened. eric holder, be the attorney general, be honest, don't train members of congress with disdain. members of the administration seem to think everytime they're grilled they get to grill back. >> the key today -- both parties have perfected this -- is noting nothing is simple. for me it's money in, money out. we're not red or blue, we're green, and there's a lot more money going out than coming in, and you bring more money in by raising tax, or cool it on spend so less money going out, and the
europe and in a luxury hotel arrested some years after the murder, the alleged murder of her ex-husband. now, there has been at love time the prosecution spent on describing that she is a money-strapped, money in-, money-grubbing woman. have they been successful she hated her ex-husband or so angry or so wanted the money she was willing to kill him? >> no, and i agree with phil. that is all they have. all that they have is motive. even the motive is a stretch. $2 million life insurance policy is a stretch. that is why they're so hard trying to make the jury dislike her. they're only calling 33 witnesses while the defense is calling 103. that is unusual. it shows where the defense is trying to instill reasonable doubt with every witness. jenna: phil, talk to us about that. that must be a strategy as well as heather is bringing up. more than 100 witnesses? >> of course they will paint her as wonderful caring mother, by the way the defense is that
this and i appreciate you guys helping me push back on it. it comes back to this. it is your money, and i am the money guy here at fox, and there's nothing magic to what i do. money in, money out. i see a lot of money going out and i can't explain it. i can't track it. when i have trouble tracking it -- i'm pretty good at this stuff -- you're in deep doo-doo and herman cain says it's not the run the country, a blind indifference to accountability. >> it's even worse than that and even worse than you pointed out. first, we don't willingly give them this money to continue to waste. they take it using the force of law. obamacare is the latest catastrophe where they do that. and secondly, it's so bad in washington, neil, even when the government accountability office documents the waste, nothing is
itself, not by doing more but doing less, not by how much you're spending, but waking up and recognizing we're spent? that would be my platform in washington. you're getting nothing from me in washington. how do you like that campaign? because that bridge to nowhere cost taxpayers everywhere. and i'm not driving on it, i'm not pushing it and i'll be damned if the funds i try to squirrel back to some well-greased palms back home are going to benefit from it. that would be my calculus in congress, waking up to basic math in congress, money in, money out. everybody, figure it out. that would be my achievement. and this, my friends, would be my bumper sticker. no bacon. no bull. or maybe this. cavuto: because we are out of cash. i'm going to explore this a lot more. just following the money trail. and getting back to the basics. if we're spending trillions of dollars, have you ever wanted to
open. the real issue of course is not what happens in the fall of 13, it's what happens in the fall of 14, and then the fall of 16. i think those are -- the republicans are being well positioned now to make points about exactly how the democrats an the obama administration has conducted themselves during this period. >> if that's the case, they're in trouble. because the polls are very clear, the polls are overwhelming that the american people blame republicans for shutting down government and i think they're buying into the idea -- people are -- maybe your base t hard right base is sending money in, but basically people are why are we in this situation? >> the fox news poll on who do you blame for the government shutdown. who do you blame, boehner at 44%, and president obama at 50%. >> the polls are exactly right. the polls that matter are going