Page 2 - Negative Inference News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Donald Trump’s rants and tangents might work on the campaign trail, but they aren’t doing him any favors in his New York bank fraud trial.Moments after the former president took the stand for the first time in the $250 million trial, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron was caught in a loop, imploring Trump’s legal counsel to “control” the unruly witness while becoming increasingly irate himself.“I beseech you to control him, if you can,” Engoron said, warning Trump attorney Christopher

As anticipated >> let's move to donald, trump shall? way as you, know on thursday he sat for a second deposition in the new york state civi case against him, his daughter ivanka sons don junior and eri as well as the trump organization unlike last, summer when h pled the fifth more than 400 times in that deposition, th a.g.'s office said he actually spoke a. what did trump have any real choice but to cooperate this time what would be the effect o pleading the fifth again tha many times >> if you plead the fifth in a civil case, unlike in criminal case, the jury ca consider the fact that you di...

He's kind of caught in this position. and if he does plead the fifth, as we were saying, a negative inference can be drawn by the jury, which means the jury can look at that in the civil case and say, oh, that's a sign that he's guilty. in the criminal case they could not do that, but on the civil side they could. so he's left with not very many choices. we'll see what he ends up choosing. >> the statements, that only the mob pleads the fifth, politically speaking or pr speaking, for the public, that's one thing. but can that be presented to the jury as statements he made in the past? is that ...

Months and months litigating interpretations of the law and being offered in bad faith in a stonewall strategy by the white house on every single angle, right? the president's tax returns, the testimony of various individuals. people like cory lewandowski who aren't even in the government. broad assumptions. this is nancy pelosi saying we're not doing this, this is serious enough, impeachable conduct, we're moving forward on this. it shifts the burden to the white house. instead of congress having to beg for documents, to translate, some way to pry it out of the executive branch, congress can ...

Of sort of white house stone walling, refusing to bribe this complaint and other additional information. what they can say. this is an extraordinarily serious allegation and if the white house refuses to provide us with any information, any information about this whistleblower complaint or the substance of the call, then we have no choice but to not extend the benefit of the doubt and to conclude that this news reporting is accurate and keep in mind the president himself this morning did suggest that this might actually be accurate. so basically congress can say that the white house can releas...