Said. one of the hardest things about our work is that there are no easy answers. reasonable people can disagree. in fact, we only take cases when there are circuits, i shouldn t say only but broadly, most of our case docket is when the courts below have disagreed and because of that, obviously, just as the larger society disagrees about the answers to some of our problems, so does the court. and if you bear that in mind, perhaps the public can be more accepting of the kind of work we do. what do you think of that? i think what s so interesting about that is that all the justices, without regard to politics, have this tremendous desire not to, what they call, foul the nest. they never want to damage the institution of the court, even as they disagree so ....