Neutral Reporting Privilege News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

today. opening statements were supposed to start at 1:30 so far though, neither side has spoken and no reason has been given for the now hour and a half delay while we are waiting, we have just learned judge davis has authorized a special master to investigate fox's handling of discovery. we're going to explain in a moment this trial, when it does eventually start again, is not being televised. and nor can it be photographed one person was already kicked out of the courtroom for a snap, which the judge has said was deleted. don't worry though, we've got our own reporters inside the c...

And his ak lights and they had a journalistic responsibility to report what those people said about the presidential election. what could be more news worthy than that? the problem is that good journalism and good law diverge and technically, you're not supposed to repeat or broadcast what other people are saying if they're false. you're responsible for what they say in effect. that's what the law is but fox has been saying no, the first amendment allows us because it's news worthy the judge in what i thought was a harsh ruling against fox said he's not going to accept the so-called neutral re...

Telling mark meadows to get donald trump to basically call off his dogs, which i think is evidence not just that they weren't telling the truth but that they knew they weren't telling the truth. >> right. here's the thing, though, i think if you were exposed as not just not telling the truth, but still actively promoting something that caused danger, caused death, and caused destruction, and i'll hit you with this first, paul, wouldn't that still make you part of an overall conspiracy? quite frankly, if i actually thought what you were doing was right, i would think that would be exculpatory i...