Page 2 - Non Attribution News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Culpability by his own lawyers' statements since he invoked the fifth amendment. yates referred to problematic conduct in her testimony, not just words. take a listen. >> the first thing we did to explain to mr. mcgahn that the underlying conduct that general flynn had engaged in was problematic in and of itself. >> what was that underlying conduct? >> i hate to frustrate you again but i'm going to have to because my knowledge of his underlying conduct is based on classified information. so i can't reveal what that underlying conduct is. >> naveed, is there any way to compare that set of state...

Fingerprints of a very clear intelligence operation. >> when you say non-attribution, what is that? >> that's a very good point. so if we think about this idea that the russians are involved in this, it's very unlikely that a russian intelligence officer -- you know, when they plan out an operation, they want to make that operation is successful. the other part of that planning is to make sure if it is compromised, that the lines that trace back to russia are in fact murky. it's very hard to come back and say, this is definitively the russians. so an example in "the wall street journal" report...

Fifth amendment. yates referred to problematic conduct in her testimony, not just words. take a listen. >> the first thing we did to explain to mr. mcgahn that the underlying conduct that general flynn had engaged in was problematic in and of itself. >> what was that underlying conduct? >> i haite to frustrate you agan but i'm going to have to because my knowledge of his underlying conduct is based on classified information. so i can't reveal what that underlying conduct is. >> naveed, is there any way to compare that set of statements from her under oath and the circle eviden circumstantial e...

Malcolm was saying, these dirty trick teams which again are a layer that are designed to confuse, to sort of make it difficult to link back to the host country. this, in fact, non-attribution that they employed to sort of make the waters murky. >> malcolm, i want to play for you shane harris who broke the story in the journal, and he's the one rachel was citing in her discussion of this story. but i want to push back a little bit on this idea that because donald trump said something, it should be treated as true when so much of what donald trump says shouldn't be treated as deferentially, auto...

Host country. this, in fact, non-attribution that they employed to sort of make the waters murky. >> malcolm, i want to play for you shane harris who broke the story in the journal, and he's the one rachel was citing in her discussion of this story. but i want to push back a little bit on this idea that because donald trump said something, it should be treated as true when so much of what donald trump says shouldn't be treated as deferentially, automatically true. he cites that statement we've played now and people have seen it repeatedly where he said, oh, russia, help me get those e-mails. h...