Live Breaking News & Updates on Non Randomized Designs

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate a person-centred model of clinical supervision to enhance person-centredness. Design: Experimental, quantitative. Methods: One hundred and three New Graduates were supported to reflect through a person-centred lens (July–December 2020). Evaluation was undertaken at 6 months using: the Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale-26 (effectiveness of supervision) and the Person-centred Practice Inventory (measures attributes of the nurse/midwife, the care environment and person-centred processes). Due to participation difficulties, scores were calculated by attendance rates using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Regular attendees scored higher on the supervision's effectiveness; however, this did not reach efficacy. ‘Finding time’ to attend contributed to low scores. Supervision scored well on its supportive function when attended. Many New Graduates perceived a decline in their care environment. Attendance aside, New Graduat ....

Contribution To Wider Community , New Graduates , Manchester Clinical Supervision , Person Centred Practice Inventory , Patient Care , Person Centred Clinical Supervision , Transparent Evaluation , Non Randomized Designs , Public Contribution , Wider Community , New Graduates , Urse Patient Relationships , Organisational Behaviour , Person Centred , Practice Development , Practice Based Learning , Professional Development , Quantitative Approaches , Reflective Practice ,