to hand over the money. the veteran can t pay for the surgery himself, he ends up putting the dog down. this is at a time when santos was still going by anthony, the other name that he used, its his mother s maiden name. the veteran didn t put it together this was the same guy until he started to see the coverage of santos on television and wanted to tell his story. he said he thought santos behavior was abhorrent. he thought there was no way this man deserved to be a member of congress. i should add one more thing, santos told a website that that allegation was fake and then today tweeted about it in a very interesting kind of nondenial-denial. in his tweet he says that the story is insane and sickening. he doesn t deny the details of the story. he points to his work with the
the mental condition of the president of the united states. but as we used to in the old days call, that s a nondenial denial. let me ask you about that because in his testimony yesterday and today, he said as you correctly point out, he said i m not qualified to determine the former president s mental health. but in your book, nancy pelosi is quoted as saying, you got the transcript, he s crazy and what he did yesterday is further evidence of his craziness. she s referring to trump. milley said, quote, madam speaker, i agree with you on everything. yes. well, that was very well reported. and it is documented. and he s saying now, i don t know whether he s claiming he said to pelosi or he just said, look, i m not qualified to determine the mental capacity of the president of the united states. he said today it s true. he said i m not a doctor.
trump administration, general mark milley reportedly according to them promised to give communist china a heads up if the u.s. planning any attack. he is accused of colluding withh other military leaders and nancy pelosi to strip the president of his sole constitutional authority as commander in chief to launch a nuclear strike if he needed to go. a nondenial denial, he defended his calls with china and called them perfectly within the scope of his job. okay, you didn t tell the director of national intelligence or the secretary of defense. did you promise or not to give china the heads up before any attack? and we get a copy of that transcript?na did you attempt to usurp the constitutional authority of the commander in chief, the president of the united states on nuclear calls? if the answer to either of those questions is yes, that would make you,, general milley, a traitor. by the way, that would make you an insurrectionist. by the way, we need to know if nancy pelosi s role in al
give communist china a heads up at the u.s. planning any attack. he is accused of colluding with other military leaders and nancy pelosi to strip the president of his sole constitutional authority as commander in chief to launch a nuclear strike if he needed to go. a nondenial denial, he defended his calls with china and called them perfectly within the scope of his job. okay, you didn t tell the director of national intelligence or the secretary of defense. it did you promise or not to give china the heads up before any attack? and we get a copy of that transcript? did you attempt to usurp the constitutional authority of the commander in chief, the president of the united states on nuclear calls? if the answer to either of those questions is yes, that would make you, general milley, a traitor. by the way, that would make you an insurrectionist. by the way, we need to know if
motion, and it has two parts. the first part outlines the terms of the indictment. it s about 20 pages highly specific. the second part makes the argument about why a sitting president can be indicted. and it s a thorough and, in fact, powerful and actually at least to me highly convincing argument. you had like a blanket pretty hard stop denial that this was ever the case. i don t think it was i don t think the specific denial was the documents as described don t exist. to me that s a nondenial denial. actually when your colleague ari melber went back and asked them about other of the documents that i discuss in the book, they refused to comment and refused to dispute the existence of the documents. you know, we re in the