bizarre let s say hypothetically, that it is all true. that he confided in her and said there was an accident. that is still under any legal theory under florida law, evidentiary would that ever come in as evidence? no. it is circumstantial at best, hearsay. i don t see how it would come in. certainly george anthony is not the defendant in this case. going along further with that hypothetical, the claims of sexual abuse don t change the fact that caylee anthony is dead. and that casey anthony has been charged with the crime. so it is just more smoke and mirrors from the defense to do whatever they can to save their client. greta: why isn t there a better relationship between jose baez and the parents or any relationship? it seems there s an enormous disconnect? prior to nine weeks ago, there was a relationship.
bizarre let s say hypothetically, that it is all true. that he confided in her and said there was an accident. that is still under any legal theory under florida law, evidentiary would that ever come in as evidence? no. it is circumstantial at best, hearsay. i don t see how it would come in. certainly george anthony is not the defendant in this case. going along further with that hypothetical, the claims of sexual abuse don t change the fact that caylee anthony is dead. and that casey anthony has been charged with the crime. so it is just more smoke and mirrors from the defense to do whatever they can to save their client. greta: why isn t there a better relationship between jose baez and the parents or any relationship? it seems there s an enormous disconnect? prior to nine weeks ago, there was a relationship.
as novel, interesting, but not confirmed science. greta, one of the things the national academy of science report criticized by microscopic hair analysis has lead to convictions of a number of innocent people by comparison studies. we have to be careful about that. greta: be careful! the prosecution has to be careful about it. the last thing the prosecution wants to do, as you say a novel theory. a novel theory if you get a conviction a court of appeals may say it is so novel we shouldn t do it and throw out the conviction. i don t understand why the prosecution is advancing anything novel. it makes vulnerable any conviction. now another problem. the cause of death. homicide by undetermined means. and the witness says, because the remains shouldn t have ended up in the woods. now, a accident could end up in the woods as well.
air. as novel, interesting, but not confirmed science. greta, one of the things the national academy of science report criticized by microscopic hair analysis has lead to convictions of a number of innocent people by comparison studies. we have to be careful about that. greta: be careful! the prosecution has to be careful about it. the last thing the prosecution wants to do, as you say a novel theory. a novel theory if you get a conviction a court of appeals may say it is so novel we shouldn t do it and throw out the conviction. i don t understand why the prosecution is advancing anything novel. it makes vulnerable any conviction. now another problem. the cause of death. homicide by undetermined means. and the witness says, because the remains shouldn t have ended up in the woods. now, a accident could end up
about whether or not that he molested her that was opening statement. now there is the suggestion that he has denied, through you, of a mistress. i m unclear whether that would even come in under any legal theory. i m not sure how it would come in either. certainly, this person crystal hallow way, also goes by river cruz. the previous counsel i ve identified my client never had anything to do with her in december it was brought up again in we came out with a statement then. recently miss cruz was seen in court under subpoena. i haven t seen her since. certainly george has not changed his testimony or miss statements that he never had an affair with this woman. never took any money from this woman. and certainly never confided in this woman. greta: what is