Obstruction Because News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The founders -- it was hamilton, if anyone wants to read it, federalist papers 65, where he said, if you are engaging in misconduct -- that's not necessarily a crime -- or just abusing the public trust. >> yeah. >> so, part of what we're doing is having a government lesson in this country, because we've done it so infrequently, we forgot how it was set up in our constitutional order. i also think, though, the democrats are absolutely right to pursue obstruction because, you know, frankly, the frustration from a legal standpoint is that robert mueller could have put it over the finish line. he ...

And never said no obstruction of justice. he couldn't charge the president with obstruction because of the doj guidelines that state a sitting president cannot be charged with federal crime in office. he's lickly to say that again tomorrow. no obstruction. no collusion. not true. when this president gets riled up about robert mueller and it's clear he's riled up. you know what he does. look over here and look there. a distraction. like his racist attacks on four congresswomen of color. known as the squad. and couldn't resist the chance to joke at them with the audience. one squad under god. a ...

President's no collusion, no obstruction mantra. we know it's false. but it bears repeating. the fact is robert mueller did not say there was no collusion. he said there wasn't enough evidence that members of the trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the russian government. he also never said there was no obstruction. mueller said he could not charge the president with obstruction because of doj guidelines that say a sitting president cannot be charged with a federal crime while in office. he's likely to say all of that again tomorrow. so no obstruction, no collusion? not true. but when...