Obstruction Determination News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Faith in mueller. A lot of people. That is mueller saying, curious to see if democrats will accept this conclusion since that came from mueller. On obstruction, katy, i fully understand if there is a debate and dispute over this, because this was not muellers definitive word. This was bob barrs word. This is where theyll be a fight. Again, politically the toothpaste is already out of the tube as they say. Yeah. So, you know, this isnt getting resolved in this country until november 2020. No doubt about that. I think what we can take from this is that the investigations will continue in congres...

Department of justice made that determination, confirmed there was no obstruction, and the case is closed. and it's time to move on. >> all right. keeping them honest, in order, he did not consider collusion, but found insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy. two, he left the obstruction determination to others not because of lack of prosecutable evidence, but lack of a mandate to prosecute. and attorney general barr did not, in sanders' words, confirm there was no obstruction, because robert mueller did not assert there was none. what william barr did with rod rosenstein's help was decid...

Mueller said yesterday. in some ways they're not intearily wrong that mueller didn't change what he said in his actual report. he just spelled it out more clearly, and also made it clear that on this basic question of did he want attorney general bill barr to make an obstruction determination about whether or not the president obstructed justice? mueller, i think, made it very clear that that's not what his intention was. he believed that the only remedy for this particular dilemma he faced was congress. that's what was laid out in the constulation. that may have been the one thing that kind o...

Conspiracy, and left the determination about obstruction up to the attorney general, because he couldn't find enough to make that determination himself. the attorney general and the deputy attorney general and other senior members of the department of justice made that determination, confirmed there was no obstruction, and the case is closed. and it's time to move on. >> all right. keeping 'em honest, in order. he did not consider collusion, but found insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy. two, he left the obstruction determination to others not because of lack of prosecutable evidence,...

The deputy attorney general, rob rosenstein and i concluded, reading from the letter. the evidence developed during the investigation is not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction of justice offense. also importantly said here our determination was made without regard to and is not based on the constitutional consideration surrounding the indictment and criminal indictment of a sitting president. that's important beaux it was not a declination because you can't indict a sitting president. a factual decision there was not evidence of obstruction. >> why did the pres...