Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180507:23:13:00
There is no o, it's called fighting back. the point i have here is obstruction. if that's all they come up with, and there's no crime except for obstruction, but there's no underlying crime whether it's money laundering or collusion or anything like that, should they go ahead with it? >> i think it depends on the level of proof they have, how convinced they are that there was obstruction, and what the impact the obstruction had on the investigation. we remember pat fitzgerald who renato worked with on the libby case, talked about throwing dirt in the umpire's eyes. if the obstruction was signi...
Source: news source