Page 39 - Off On News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Fbi affidavit speaking -- >> he signed the affidavit as the attorney general of the united states. did he not conduct the robe. >> how can you come to the conclusion that a working reporter with a long standing excellent career in washington is somehow now involved in espionage. that is the question. >> but the problem is it went to holder and he okayed it. >> he okay thed the work of his investigators. >> so now -- >> you are saying he is not ultimately responsible as the head man of the justice department who personally signed off on this? >> he signed off on it. >> he signed off on -- >> to...

Medicare is exploding. billions of dollars, and we have millions of people are counting on it, will be retiring. baby boomers are retiring will go larger and larger. yet we have not talked about that yet. while we're talking about grover norquist versus these members i think the devil will be in the details. we'll have to talk about a broader conversation between tax revenue and entitlement reform. jon: so, doug, if republicans are open to revenue increases whether that means tax rates or something else we'll get into just a bit, but if they are open to that, what are dome kratz willing to giv...

Keeping up. to find out what the folks had to say. >> afternoon. what we are hearing today is a sharp divide between interpretation of the former c.i.a. director david petraeus' system by the congressional republicans and congressional democrats. republicans on the one hand said sometime after the c.i.a. talk points about benghazi issued by the c.i.a. keywording that pointed to a terrorist attack was taken out. republicans want to know who took it out. democrats are in protective mode around u.s. ambassador rice and the president. >> the issue is whether susan rice should be pillarried for usi...

Divided. >> sure, greg. republicans are maintaining that keywording that pointed to al-qaeda's involvement in the attack was taken out of the talking points that were produced by the cia. republicans want to know what took them out. democrats are in a protective mode defending u.n. ambassador rice and the president. >> the issue is whether or not susan rice should be pilleried for using an intelligence report which david petraeus signed off on. which the dni, the director of national intelligence, mr. clapper, signed off on. were they part of a coverup? did they do something wrong? and them. >...

>> it was circulated among several intelligence agencies. each in a process like this would add in the word smithing of the document to make sure it was accurate and didn't disclose so much information that it would tip off our classified sources or methods. that's what they said was done when the general was asked especially was the final product something you signed off on. it was clear yes it was. the general said he thought initially it was terrorism and i think all of us recognized from the get go when you are firing mortars and rpgs at an american facility that is terrorism but the more ...