Page 3 - Oversight Activity News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

White houses traditionally do for very intense oversight activity. they could one day become an impeachment inquiry. so they'll be adding lawyers to deal with what will be a very heavy burden of replying, as indeed they're obligated to reply to these congressional inquiries. and as you saw, as you noted in the reporting from the "new york times," they're going to be working very closely to make sure -- or they're going to try to work closely with the coms department, the communications staff, to make sure the lawyers and the communications department of the white house are, if you will, in syn...

Comment was the efforts by some to turn legitimate oversight activity into unwarranted -- >> we appreciate. >> criticism of the fbi and doing nothing but doing its job. >> there are a lot of us here that don't like congress particularly too and i'm sure that the vast majority of american people would agree with you on that. mr. strzok, you were removed from the mueller investigation, correct in. >> yes. >> but for the most part all the others that were there are still there, correct? >> i can't speak to the current staffing or personnel of. >> greg andrews who gave $1,000 to the democratic run...

What i was stating in that comment was the efforts by some to turn legitimate oversight activity into unwarranted -- >> we appreciate that -- >> there's a criticism of the fbi -- >> there's a lot of us up here that don't like congress particularly too. a lot of the american people, the vast majority would agree with you on that. mr. strzok, you were removed from the mueller investigation, correct? >> yes. >> but for the most part, all the others that were there are still there, correct? >> i can't speak to the current staffing and personnel -- >> let me tell you who they are. greg andras who g...

Precedent in exactly the same way. whereas telling devin nunes and trey gowdy, who's not a member of the gang of eight, would be a bigger break with law enforcement traditions. so it would materially change it. it also might mean there's going to be a fight tomorrow between the intelligence community and the white house as to who can be in that meeting. >> yeah, and i think you -- that makes a lot of sense what you're saying, is it an oversight activity or this conspiracy-oriented political meeting which as you documented would be something quite different. i wish i could keep you but you get ...

Yet, they refuse to give any credibility to such sources when it may be something positive or expull can a tore. the other double standard is the investigation. have you democrats every single day saying investigate, investigate. special prosecutors, investigate. well what are they afraid of here? let's investigate this and see where it leads. so let's have the house and senate intelligence committee do their work and think about whether to include this but the president has made clear that he would like there to be an investigation of any possible abuses. and that hopefully that oversight act...