Paul Last News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

questions, ladies and gentlemen. raise more questions that we wouldn't have to be dealing with if they had simply secured maggie's phone on june 8th when they got it, we wouldn't be here. so we do know from the timeline that alex left the property at 9:07. were they killed before he left? y don't know the answer to that. i don't know the answer to that. we do know if he was in the house when the shots were made down at the kennel, that he would not have heard them. we had decibel testing from mr. sutton. they were angry with mr. suttons test, not angry, challenged his conclusion on m...

have to be consistent with each other and have to point conclusively to the guilt of alex murdaugh, beyond a reasonable doubt. these circumstances just raise more questions, ladies and gentlemen. raise more questions that we wouldn't have to be dealing with if they had just simply secured mag maggie's phone on june 8th when they got it. we wouldn't be here. we do know from the time line that alex left the property at 9:07. were they killed before he left? i don't know the answer to that. i don't know the answer to that. we do know that if he was in the house when the shots were made ...

Not use words anymore, caught up on the feels. >> lisa: i've been hearing emotion on either side, two things i'm caught up, putting myself in the mind of a juror, they convinced me he's a bad man, liar, potentially capable of murder, is he capable of these murders beyond a reasonable doubt? i don't know if i'm there for two reasons. one, motive doesn't add up, distract and delay from financial investigation? you could convince me he killed paul because the boot crash led to unravelling of his family and maggie was potentially thinking about divorcing him and he felt my life would be better wit...

You mentioned you could understand the killing perhaps of paul because -- >> to be clear, i would never kill anyone. >> harris: no, no, i didn't say you would, i mean in erm its of motive, it is legally not necessary. what is interesting about that is the evidence shows that maggie at one point was survived, she was surviving and running toward her son. he actually from the evidence, from the forensics was shot and killed first. i don't know, we can't get inside his brain, there are some issues with what the motive could be based on even how they were killed. now you have to kill a witness. >>...

He would not under any circumstances murder those that meant the most to him. your oath requires that you hold the state to exacting standard of proof that the state must prove the defendant guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and when they rely solely on circumstantial evidence, circumstances must be consistent with each other and when taken together point conclusively to the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt and merely portray the behavior of defendant suspicious, you must find him not guilty. the state fails to meet the retirement, circumstances don't point conclusively to alex's g...