Employment – Misclassification – Oral agreement | Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
Where a plaintiff has alleged that the defendant attorney misclassified him as an independent contractor rather than an employee, the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment should be denied because of the existence of contested material facts. “In this civil action, plaintiff Paul W. Cote (‘Cote’) alleges that pursuant to a 1994 oral agreement between the
Source: masslawyersweekly.com