Stay updated with breaking news from Phase in. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Easy on me, kid. i m wondering how you interpreted that. that s what he wanted me to do. i didn t really think much about it, to be honest with you. the kid. that s what was that an issue for you at all? no. no. the did you the but i ll tell you why. because we re both on that stage running for president. so i m pretty clear about who i am. nobody s going to define me on that stage. right. yeah. in terms of health care, you ve just put out your plan yep. in past debates people have raised questions about where you were on whether or not private insurance should be taken away from people. yeah. your plan is essentially kind of a medicare for all except people can keep their plans if they like them for the first ten years. is that correct? essentially. there is a ten-year phase in, but what i ve done is that, you know, i have to tell you, anderson, i ve been listening to people and i said from the first day that i announced my ....
Population, over the course of a ten-year phase-in would also move to a medicare for all system but the new part of this is essentially she is allowing private insurers to also offer plans. she was very specific in saying those private insurers, if they were to offer competing plans, would have to adhere to strict cost and benefit requirements. essentially meet the standard the government plan would put into place. all right, vaughn. thank you so much. no doubt it ll be a big focus tomorrow evening. still to come the 2020 candidates and their last-minute debate preps. they re under way. we know the president has painted them all as socialists, saying that democrats will destroy the economy. friday s lower than expected gdp numbers reminded us that the president is not presiding over the greatest economy ever. what are democrats going to do about that? o do about that hmm. exactly. ....
And dealing with voter suppression and preexisting conditions, health care and other items that you mentioned and that we discussed this week in the conference in washington? how do we get the conversation there, because there s a lot of chatter about who should be the speaker, who should be this chairman or that chairman of committee, but the people voted because they wanted change? that s exactly right, al. i think we have got to be both. you will remember you will remember and i remember newt gingrich back with so-called contract with america. i disagreed with everything that he said, but he was bold and he said in 100 days we re going to do a to z and that s what we ve got to do. we ve got to raise that minimum wage up front, 15 bucks an hour, pay equity for women. we have got to go forward on medicare for all. al, the first, you know the first year of my four year phasein of medicare for all calls for lowering the ....
Letter right there. brian: general mattis spoke before our show on route to singapore. he wanted everyone to know. listen, the road to these negotiations is going to be bumpy. going to be good and bad days. not going to be we will hand all t nukes. i asked the president that, too. what about the thought that we don t even know where all their nukes arey so complicated and it s such a big program it might take some te. and keep this in mind, too. if theltimate goal is denuclearization. and irretrievable, unrevokable all types of negativity towards nukes, re you going to go about it he says it might take phases. listen. brian: you are okay with a phase-in of denuclearization if confidence measures are required? we are going to see. i would like to have to done immediately. physically a phase-in may be a little bit necessary. it would have to be a rapid phase-in. i would like to see it done at one time. steve: let me get it ....
At least opically both sides are dialing down rhetoric a lot and these are the two most fiery and unpredictable personalities on the world stage. that s been interesting to watch. both of these people want to meet. we don t know if they ll be able to come to a deal on ultimately about denuclearization, but it s very clear they both really want to meet and both want to have this happen, and you can see it in the posture. tell me what the u.s. might be willing to give up or give in return for denuclearization? well, i think that what we have, the only thing we have right now are donald trump s statements where he intimated a possibility of being interested in some baby steps, incremental steps of getting there nap a phase-in could be appropriate. once they see north korea as a great commercial success and sees it as a great opportunity. so clearly, i think we re falling back into a pattern we ve fallen in the past. possibly. of trading economic, opening ....