Page 3 - Plame Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Terrorism. brace for us going down. that's a problem. they breached that duty. as a result of it they caused damages. the big mark on this is they there are not the injuries. but there are injuries, they are not physical, they are mental. mental and psychological damages can certainly be very compelling and i think they are compelling here. martha: often, tom you hear cases like really, emotional damages, whatever it was, somebody took away your tootsie roll, in this case how could people not get scarred by this? i'd be absolutely terrified to get on a plane. >> this is a law school concept. i...

Here and makes you stop and wonder. first of all, i think the reporters tend to, when a leak bolsters their world view, they tend to be for giving of the leaker. for example, the wikileaks or the terrorist surveillance programs as the new york times once broke, but if the leak goes the other way like the plame case or climate gate, the reporters tend to say why was this leaked? these people should be prosecuted. so initially, this, because the press is anti-war, was seized upon by the press. oh, my god, the pentagon papers and later they thought, wait a minute, actually, this is obama's war. a...

Were downplaying it and it makes you wonder why is that? first of all, i think reporters tend to, when a leak bolsters their world view, they tend to be very forgiving of their leaker, for example the wikileaks or the surveillance program the new york times once broke but if the leak goes the other way like the plame case or climate-gate, they will say why was it leaked, these people should be prosecuted. this, because it was anti--war, was seized upon by the press, oh, my god, it is the pentagon papers and they said wait a minute, this is obama's war and they wanted to give him some coverage....

>> now, that's not anything new here and makes you stop and wonder. first of all, i think the reporters tend to, when a leak bolsters their world view, they tend to be for giving of the leaker. for example, the wikileaks or the terrorist surveillance programs as the new york times once broke, but if the leak goes the other way like the plame case or climate gate, the reporters tend to say why was this leaked? these people should be prosecuted. so initially, this, because the press is anti-war, was seized upon by the press. oh, my god, the pentagon papers and later they thought, wait a minute, ...