Plutonium Pathway News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

But importantly having an opportunity for -- from the horse's mouth, so to speak, first time ever from the korean leader. what is it would take for them to be secure enough, to feel secure enough, they wouldn't need nuclear weapons. >> mike haden, isn't it fair to say that the president has set a high bar which is to say this deal has to be better than the iran deal? and the iran deal got rid of -- there there were no nuclear weapons. it got rid of any plutonium pathway. cement was poured into the core of that reactor. 98% of enriched uranium has to go away. inspections from between 15 to 25 y...

But importantly having an opportunity for -- from the horse's mouth, so to speak, first time ever from the korean leader. what is it would take for them to be secure enough, to feel secure enough, they wouldn't need nuclear weapons. >> mike haden, isn't it fair to say that the president has set a high bar which is to say this deal has to be better than the iran deal? and the iran deal got rid of -- there there were no nuclear weapons. it got rid of any plutonium pathway. cement was poured into the core of that reactor. 98% of enriched uranium has to go away. inspections from between 15 to 25 y...

Have several potential path ways to a bomb. with it they won't have any. the plutonium pathway will be blocked because it won't have a reactor producing plutonium for a weapon and it won't build any more avenue i water react orz for at least 16 years, we have the ability to watch them and know precisely what they're doing p. >> the country would not enrich uranium to a level higher than 3.67%. let me be clear. no one can build a bottom from a skok pile of 300 kill grams of your neighborhood and not go over 7.63%.

In addition, the iaea will have more inspectors working in iran using modern technologies such as real time enrichment monitoring, high tech electronic seals and cameras that are always watching 24/7, 365. it further, iran has agreed never to pursue key technologies that would be necessary to develop a nuclear explosive device. so the agreement deals not only with the production of fissile material, but also with the critical issue of weaponization. because of all of these limitations and guarantees, we can sum up by saying that without this agreement, the i n iranians would have several poten...

They're trying to say it's not a treaty. we don't need full approval yet it is going to be binding. that's nonsense. congress made a huge mistake giving away some of their oversight authority. not only do they need anytime, anywhere inspections. they're not giving up their plutonium pathway, not giving up many of the other things that should be part of a good deal, much less saying they're going to cut off support for international terrorism. republicans should tout this administration a bad deal is worse than no deal. we're going to take military options off the table. i think the next comman...