Potentially Preempt Constitutional Processes News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Generations yet unborn, we have got to guard this moment. This is our watch. And again, i am soso very proud of the Judiciary Committee, i am so very, very proud of the Intelligence Committee because they went in and tried to pull out the facts so that they could paint the picture so that america could see it. And hopefully, they will not be ladies like the lady at amashs town hall meeting who said they didnt know that there was something wrong that trump did with regard in this Mueller Report. And so again, we, the speaker is absolutely right. She told us a little bit earlier that she wants t...

Wrong doing." that process other than the criminal justice system for accusing a president of wrong-doing, is that impeachment? >> i'm not going to comment on that. >> in your report you also wrote that you did not want to "potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct." for the nonlawyers in the room, what did you mean by "potentially preempt constitutional processes " ? >> i'm not going to try to explain that. >> that's coming from pay o page one of volume two in the footnote is the reference to this. what are those constitutional processes? >> i think i...

Say that one specific word. >> at your may 29th, it wasn't 19 press conference you explained that "the opinion says that the constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrong doing." that process other than the criminal justice system for accusing a president of wrong-doing, is that impeachment? >> i'm not going to comment on that. >> in your report you also wrote that you did not want to "potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct." for the nonlawyers in the room, what did you mean by...

Litigating a interview with the president. >> and that wasn't the only unanswered question here that both sides and this is pretty interesting, both sides got into. there was also this question that i'm sure if you followed our coverage of the mueller report you heard about, which is was the obstruction nals clear enough. could bob mueller like other prosecutors like ken starr, have said more clearly what donald trump did and whether it amounted to criminal conduct. we saw lawmakers of all stripes demanding more clarity on these points. >> for the nonlawyers in the room, what did you mean by "...