Page 19 - Precedent Setting News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Change the supreme court's minds slough that would seem a little unlikely but i can't anticipate what the man on sunday management might decide if it is. you the man on sunday management might decide if it is— decide if it is. you said it's not precedent-setting _ decide if it is. you said it's not precedent-setting because i decide if it is. you said it's not| precedent-setting because the decide if it is. you said it's not i precedent-setting because the law is precedent—setting because the law is clear on this on what's a breach of privacy and the argument sayjust because they're in the...

Asked whether this case may set a new precedent. take a listen. >> i don't think it's that kind of case. you know, when you want to talk about implications and precedent and things like that, is it ever going to happen again? you know, is there ever going to be just a total unrest in kenosha or some other city and that's going to happen? you know, i just don't see that. it was a case about self-defense. >> is that ever going to happen again? how interesting. do you think this case was precedent setting or not? >> well, i think those remarks are delusional at best. what we have here is a situat...

Case and has a lot of information, if you go to court and try to say i have some secret and privileged information, i shouldn't be told to share there, and he's sharing, he's sharing and she's sharing, what's your excuse? the voluntary engagement of the staffers could change the dynamic in a big way. >> it could in court but most importantly in the short term the information-gathering. you don't necessarily have to be mark meadows the former white house chief of staff to have information about what was going on. kaitlan's excellent reporting here is that there are five former staffers, and the...

We are going to start seeing soon. this subpoena is part of it. it's part of the larger precedent setting of congress' ability to have oversight. broadly speaking for the january 6th committee, they are getting information. it's not like they're sitting in a black hole of nothing. they're just not having access to what steve bannon has, which is important because we know he was in touch with the former president. at the same time, there are other people who were subpoenaed who also were. that's just as important as well. >> barbara mcwade is back with us. i'm thinking back to the conversation ...

Answer whether this could be precedent-setting? >> yes. >> okay. you did it. thank you very much. good to have you. we'll look forward to seeing you again. it was an horrific attack on a train. almost as disturbing, nobody tried to help the victim. where were the good samaritans?