Page 3 - Preemption Argument News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Now and even with proposed -- what is proposed is less restrictive. bill: you don't buy it at all. >> not at all. bill: we go to the case here, that we are waiting to get word, and, what the governor is arguing, ann marie -- the law has not been proven because it has not been implemented yet. >> that's right, no harm because nothing happened and after it takes effect there may not be harm depending on how it takes effect. bill: and with your argument does the judge wait until it goes into effect and measures the impact or does the evidence have to be reintroduced in her court. >> it depends on...

Immigration law. that's according to the associated press. attorney general eric holder and his team are expected to file the lawsuit on the grounds that only the federal government has the right to enforce immigration laws, essentially saying states don't have the right to protect their own boarders, it's what we call in the law a preemption argument. now listen, we are told, we are told that that is going to be the main basis for the lawsuit, but we are also led to believe that the second basis for this lawsuit could be that it is disnegligence in a tore raoefplt keep in mind that this -- di...

>> sean: i'm listening to your optimism and good cheer. you said you would take this as far as the supreme court if necessary. it seems the judge bought into the aclu, a lot people don't know this, there are seven litigants in this case. the judge bought into the aclu's preemption argument. they were arguing on supremacy, preemption everything but the way the president characterized the bill about racial profiling, they didn't argue that. the federal government has always relied on local police forces. for example, to help enforce the federal drug laws. immigration laws. it seems to me what th...

>> sean: i'm listening to your optimism and good cheer. you said you would take this as far as the supreme court if necessary. it seems the judge bought into the aclu, a lot people don't know this, there are seven litigants in this case. the judge bought into the aclu's preemption argument. they were arguing on supremacy, preemption everything but the way the president characterized the bill about racial profiling, they didn't argue that. the federal government has always relied on local police forces. for example, to help enforce the federal drug laws. immigration laws. it seems to me what th...