CNN Smerconish May 31, 2014 13:50:00
>> i guess the question it begs is does the constitution recognize the individual's right to a firearm apart from the militia? >> certainly not in the what it means a sacred right and no gun law could be passed because that would trample on that right. they had gun laws and using guns for other purposes and more significantly ewe can't get the answer by going back in a time machine and tapping james madison on the shoulder and saying, well, what did you mean? the country evolved and it's always been the subject of a fight over what it means. the reason we think it means this individual right n...
Source: archive.org