Page 2 - Privacy Argument News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Produce any other thing in its custody or under his control, and the test of relation to the inquiry is not in that part of the act, so you could probablyjust get the phone itself even if there are problems with getting the... the roblem problems with getting the... the problem is _ problems with getting the... the problem is what is deemed to be relevant material and one would assume the chair of that inquiry is the person who should deem whether it is relevant or not? yes. the person who should deem whether it is relevant or not?— it is relevant or not? yes, and as to the privacy — it is...

I think we're essentially back where we were in 1973 because the judges concluded that the right to abortion was not in the constitution. it isn't. the roe v. wade decision was flooded many ways including that it wasn't in the constitution. it was never defined in the viability question. the privacy argument was very. week >> i guess that really says that both sides, then, need to mobilize and get their side out in big numbers. tim, i know you wrote an opinion piece entitled for conservatives saying, it's just a pit stop -- justice clarence thomas i've mentioned, he writes a concurring opinion...

That scoping memo. eventually those criminal cases get finished. eventually those things get done. if it's an intelligence matter and not a criminal matter does adam schiff tonight have a when he says regardless of prosecution we on the intelligence committee get to know everything that has consequences and that's a requirement by law. >> i think he does and there is precedent, there's a d.c. circuit precedent from the watergate era that say if they send a subpoena ask for the information, they should be able to get it. even grand jury information, intelligence information. there are certain c...

Circuit president and more than the intelligence committee that says if they send a subpoena or ask for the information, they should be able to get it. even grand jury information, intelligence information. there are channels that can flow through. i do think members of congress will see that eventually. whether the public sees every bit of that i'm not totally sure if there were bit players here that maybe came across mueller's scope at one point. they might have a privacy argument but if you're a senior white house official, certainly as we saw in hillary clinton's case with her aids, those ...

Whether the public sees every bit of that i'm not totally sure if there were bit players here that maybe came across mueller's scope at one point. they might have a privacy argument but if you're a senior white house official, certainly as we saw in hillary clinton's case with her aids, those privacy concerns were deemed to not be sufficient to with hold that kind of information from congress and i assume that the justice department would have to make the same judgements. i think that barr looks at that 420-0 vote on releasing the report that we got from the house of representatives the other ...