Live Breaking News & Updates on Probation Versus Jail
Stay updated with breaking news from Probation versus jail. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
That in and of itself is a horrifying thought. let me ask you about this statement ahmadinejad said. you have eight of our people if you want those who, give us our eight. who are these eight people? several people convicted in u.s. courts here for violating u.s. sanctions and doing business with iran, providing military equipment or trying to provide military equipment to iran and providing sensitive nuclear materials. those folks aren t going anywhere? these are u.s. citizens as well. a couple are dual iranian/u.s. citizens one is a full u.s. citizen. they have been convicted and they re in jail here, which leads to the question, are the two boys back in iran used as a bargaining trip to get these guys out which seems unlikely due to u.s. rules on these things. one of the thing said, they re going to trial, no matter what. what is that going to be like? they re also expecting sarah shourd to come back for trial. she s out on $500,000 bail. ....
Across the country. they are giving judges information about how much it costs to put someone in jail or in prison as opposed to putting them on probation, and should that play into a decision that s made about what their sentence is joined by karen de soto, a defense attorney, and a former new york prosecutor, also a media law professor at seton hall. this is absolutely fascinating. show people some examples. let s say somebody gets prosecuted for child endangerment. it would cost $37,000 to keep them in prison for a year but probation about $6,800. you can see the difference in second degree robbery, huge difference, statutory rape, $186,000 on a 15-year sentence as opposed to about $9,000. the numbers, i think, aren t necessarily so surprising that ....
Put him in jail, 39% chance he will commit another felony. give him supervised probation, which costs one-third, there s only a 20% chance that he will repeat his crime. so the judge has all of this he has all of this data, and why shouldn t a judge have all of this information when he s making this important decision? you should always try to get somebody on probation versus jail to give that person a second chance which is how when you re doing a sentencing, you get a presentence report and judges always give people the chance to get on probation versus putting them in jail because they know in the back of their heads it s cheaper. however, should that be a factor, should that be in the presentence report? should the judge have it right in front of him saying this is going to cost $50,000 versus $30,000 versus $6,000? i don t think that s an element that can enter his mind. how can you be opposed a jue having information available? it is not individual cases. the whole world, ....