Page 10 - Process Issue News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Vote present. not for or against. that republicans from montana can stay at his daughters wedding. so, the 50-50 dream of mike pence the vice president. then he would get to come in and be the deciding vote that would hand the generation of jurisprudence. that is unlikely. sorry vice president. a man who knows a thing or two about devicive political fights. richard nixons former white house counsel. john dean. good to have you, sir. >> thank you chris. >> i'm not surprised we arrived at this occasion. i would not have thought it would have been 50-48. this shouldn't come as that much of a surp...

That is so, really unfortunate thing, but that is how he got the there. >> and it is no surprise that he attacks dianne feinstein for the leaks. she comes from where the senate, your word is your bond. and she said she did not leak it. now if it is someone from congress or related to dr. ford remains to be seen, but i agree she did hold it too long, but she did not leak it. >> and that is part of the problem that is the safe harbor for a lot of the republican members of the committee is the process under which this information was revealed to the public and starting with the fact that she sat ...

With trade. i'm a former u.s. trade representative and so i've been involved in some of these issues and in this particular case, it's the national security bill called the national defense authorization bill and this a revenue measure and the house would have the measure to send the bill back us to and we have to start over. it's a process issue, but bob corker raises a good point with regard that the tariffs being imposed is because of the use of the 232 which is for national security aren't necessarily being used properly. in other rds, i do think there is a national security issue with reg...

Problem. i agree with the form commenter. he was asked about senator franken. there was a process issue. he's very close to senator frankenho immediately resigned. i do think he would never support anybody being forced to do something against their will. and i do agree the words chosen weren't the best choices. but i think that -- that's exactly what he meant. he would never support somebody at any time in our history, norms should never change about doing something against people's will. >> did it sound he was implying, though, that senator frankpen's accuser was doing something wrong? >> if ...

Great regularity. he has to be precise and right on point, and he wasn't. >> here's what a spokesperson for bill clinton said. it was clear from the context he was not suggesting there was ever a time it was acceptable to do something against someone's will. he's saying that norms have changed in a variety of ways and how we interact with one another, and that's all for the good. so is this a word choice problem, or is there more to it? what do you think of that statement? >> for sure it's a word choice problem. i agree with the former commenter. he was asked about franken. there was a process...